Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BOCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 5-5 Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 73481/01
• EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01
• EGMR, 22.11.2017 - 73481/01

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 33977/96

  ILIJKOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  The relevant provisions of the 1974 Code of Criminal Procedure and the Bulgarian courts" practice before 1 January 2000 are summarised in the Court's judgments in several similar cases (see, among others, Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, §§ 25-36, ECHR 1999-II; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 55-59, 26 July 2001; and Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 79-88, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  According to the Court's case-law, Article 5 § 4 enshrines, as does Article 6 § 1, a right of access to a court, which can only be subject to reasonable limitations that do not impair its very essence (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, §§ 82-90, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)).
• EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 27156/02

  MORBY contre le LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  However, this rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable-time requirement of Article 6 § 1 and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see, as recent authorities, Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI; Mladenov v. Bulgaria, no. 58775/00, § 31, 12 October 2006; Sheremetov v. Bulgaria, no. 16880/02, § 33, 22 May 2008; and Menelaou v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 32071/04, 12 June 2008).

 
• EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39084/97

  YANKOV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  The relevant provisions of the 1974 Code of Criminal Procedure and the Bulgarian courts" practice before 1 January 2000 are summarised in the Court's judgments in several similar cases (see, among others, Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, §§ 25-36, ECHR 1999-II; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 55-59, 26 July 2001; and Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 79-88, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 42987/98

  VACHEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  Turning to the merits of the complaint, the Court observes that, according to its case-law, Article 5 § 5 is complied with where it is possible to apply for compensation in respect of a deprivation of liberty effected in conditions contrary to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 or 4 (see, among many other authorities, Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 78, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 55389/00

  DOBREV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  The amendments and the resulting practice of the Bulgarian courts are summarised in the Court's judgments in the cases of Dobrev v. Bulgaria (no. 55389/00, §§ 32-35, 10 August 2006), and Yordanov v. Bulgaria (no. 56856/00, §§ 21-24, 10 August 2006).
• EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 56856/00

  YORDANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  The amendments and the resulting practice of the Bulgarian courts are summarised in the Court's judgments in the cases of Dobrev v. Bulgaria (no. 55389/00, §§ 32-35, 10 August 2006), and Yordanov v. Bulgaria (no. 56856/00, §§ 21-24, 10 August 2006).
• EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 58775/00

  MLADENOV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  However, this rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable-time requirement of Article 6 § 1 and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see, as recent authorities, Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI; Mladenov v. Bulgaria, no. 58775/00, § 31, 12 October 2006; Sheremetov v. Bulgaria, no. 16880/02, § 33, 22 May 2008; and Menelaou v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 32071/04, 12 June 2008).
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 58971/00

  RADOSLAV POPOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  However, when on 15 January 2001 the Sofia Court of Appeal sent the applicant's request for release of December 2000 to the Sofia City Court with instructions to examine it, the latter failed to do so (see paragraph 20 above and Radoslav Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 58971/00, § 49, 2 November 2006).
• EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 16880/02

  SHEREMETOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 73481/01

  However, this rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable-time requirement of Article 6 § 1 and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see, as recent authorities, Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI; Mladenov v. Bulgaria, no. 58775/00, § 31, 12 October 2006; Sheremetov v. Bulgaria, no. 16880/02, § 33, 22 May 2008; and Menelaou v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 32071/04, 12 June 2008).
• EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 32071/04

  MENELAOU v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88

  CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 11.10.2016 - C-439/16

  Milev - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren - …

  28 - Vgl. beispielsweise die vom vorlegenden Gericht angeführten Urteile EGMR, 25. März 1999, Nikolova/Bulgarien [GK], CE:ECHR:1999:0325JUD003119596, §§ 61 bis 66, 26. Juli 2001, Ilijkov/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2001:0726JUD003397796, §§ 95 bis 97, 21. Juli 2003, Hristov/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2003:0731JUD003543697, §§ 116 bis 120, 9. Juni 2005, I. I./Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD004408298, §§ 103 bis 106, 21. Dezember 2006, Vassilev/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2006:1221JUD006254400, §§ 33 bis 39, 13. November 2008, Bochev/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD007348101, §§ 64 bis 66 und 71, 21. April 2009, Rangelov/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2009:0423JUD001438703, §§ 44 bis 47, 22. Oktober 2009, Dimitrov/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2009:1022JUD003627502, §§ 86 bis 90, 26. November 2009, Koriyski/Bulgarien, ECHR:2009:1126JUD001925703, §§ 44 bis 46, sowie 27. März 2012, Gerdjikov/Bulgarien, CE:ECHR:2012:0327JUD002706104.
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 18938/07

  RADKOV AND SABEV v. BULGARIA

  This provision does not refer to security arrangements in courtrooms (see paragraph 15 above) and in a number of earlier judgments the Court has held that it is not applicable to circumstances which are not expressly listed therein (see, for example, Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria, no. 34529/10, § 95, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Barborski v. Bulgaria, no. 12811/07, § 33, 26 March 2013; Makedonski v. Bulgaria, no. 36036/04, § 28, 20 January 2011; and Bochev v. Bulgaria, no. 73481/01, § 77, 13 November 2008).
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 49502/08

  BOZHILOV c. BULGARIE

  Dans ces circonstances, la Cour estime que les autorités ont offert au requérant une réparation adéquate en réduisant la peine infligée d'une manière expresse et mesurable (voir Beck c. Norvège, no 26390/95, § 28, 26 juin 2001, Hadjiiski et Iliev c. Bulgarie (déc.), nos 68454/01 et 68456/01, 2 juin 2005, Botchev c. Bulgarie, no 73481/01, § 83, 13 novembre 2008).
• EGMR, 28.01.2010 - 30122/03

  SIMEONOV c. BULGARIE

  La Cour rappelle sa jurisprudence constante selon laquelle une décision ou une mesure favorable au requérant ne suffit en principe à lui retirer la qualité de «victime» que si les autorités nationales ont reconnu, explicitement ou en substance, puis réparé la violation de la Convention (voir parmi beaucoup d'autres Constantinescu c. Roumanie, no 28871/95, § 40, CEDH 2000-VIII; Botchev c. Bulgarie, no 73481/01, § 90, 13 novembre 2008).