Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55463) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
C.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 4, Art. 4 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4-1 - Servitude) Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
C. N. gegen Großbritannien
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
C.N. v. the United Kingdom
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08
- EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 4239/08
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). - EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98
M.C. c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08
In view of the Court's findings in Siliadin, it cannot but find that the legislative provisions in force in the United Kingdom at the relevant time were inadequate to afford practical and effective protection against treatment falling within the scope of Article 4 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 179, ECHR 2003-XII). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08
In its Rantsev judgment, the Court held that as with Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, Article 4 may, in certain circumstances, require a State to take operational measures to protect victims, or potential victims, of treatment in breach of that Article (see, mutatis mutandis, Osman, cited above, § 115; and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 115, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 26.07.2005 - 73316/01
SILIADIN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08
The applicant noted that in Siliadin v. France, no. 73316/01, § 123, ECHR 2005-VII the Court defined servitude as a "particularly serious form of denial of freedom" which included "in addition to the obligation to perform certain services for others... the obligation for the "serf" to live on another person's property and the impossibility of altering his condition". - EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 2872/02
K.U. v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 4239/08
She considered this figure to be appropriate in light of the recent case of M.C. v. Bulgaria (cited at paragraph 76, above) and K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, ECHR 2008, and taking into account the duration of the ill-treatment.
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 16.07.2015 - C-340/14
Trijber - Richtlinie 2006/123/EG - Art. 2 Abs. 2 Buchst. d - Begriff der …
51 - Vgl. Urteil des EGMR vom 13. November 2012, C. N./Vereinigtes Königreich, Beschwerde-Nr. 4239/08, Rn. 69.