Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,34609
EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05 (https://dejure.org/2014,34609)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.11.2014 - 5548/05 (https://dejure.org/2014,34609)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. November 2014 - 5548/05 (https://dejure.org/2014,34609)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,34609) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 44363/02

    RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05
    The law should be accessible to the persons concerned and formulated with sufficient precision to enable them-if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I, and Ramazanova and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 44363/02, § 62, 1 February 2007).
  • EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11801/85

    KRUSLIN c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05
    The Court notes in this connection that it is not its task to substitute its own interpretation for that of the national authorities, and notably the courts, as it is primarily for the latter to interpret and apply domestic law (see Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no. 176-A, and Seyidzade, cited above, § 35).
  • EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 25594/94

    HASHMAN AND HARRUP v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05
    The level of precision required of domestic legislation depends to a considerable degree on the content of the instrument in question and the field it is designed to cover (see Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-III, and Hashman and Harrup v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25594/94, § 31, ECHR 1999-VIII).
  • EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

    MAESTRI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05
    The law should be accessible to the persons concerned and formulated with sufficient precision to enable them-if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (see Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I, and Ramazanova and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 44363/02, § 62, 1 February 2007).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30985/96

    HASSAN ET TCHAOUCH c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 5548/05
    Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion and the manner of its exercise (see Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 1480/16

    HASHEMI ET AUTRES c. AZERBAÏDJAN

    C'est au premier chef aux autorités nationales, notamment aux cours et tribunaux, qu'il incombe d'interpréter la législation interne (Seyidzade c. Azerbaïdjan, no 37700/05, § 35, 3 décembre 2009, 1slam-Ittihad Association et autres c. Azerbaïdjan, no 5548/05, § 49, 13 novembre 2014, et Paradiso et Campanelli c. Italie [GC], no 25358/12, § 169, 24 janvier 2017).
  • EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 13918/06

    SAVENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    The Court's assessment 57. Decisions by the authorities to refuse to register, or to dissolve a group have been found to affect directly both the group itself and also its presidents, founders or individual members (see Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow and Others v. Russia, no. 302/02, § 101, 10 June 2010, with further references; see also Islam-Ittihad Association and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 5548/05, § 58, 13 November 2014, and Zhdanov and Others v. Russia, nos. 12200/08 and 2 others, § 116, 16 July 2019).
  • EGMR, 16.07.2019 - 12200/08

    ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    41340/98 and 3 others, §§ 49-50, ECHR 2003-II; Republican Party of Russia v. Russia, no. 12976/07, §§ 91 and 100, 1 April 2011; Sindicatul "Pastorul cel Bun" v. Romania [GC], no. 2330/09, §§ 81 and 149, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Association of Victims of Romanian Judges and Others v. Romania, no. 47732/06, §§ 11 and 20, 14 January 2014; and Islam-Ittihad Association and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 5548/05, §§ 31 and 41, 13 November 2014).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht