Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 64385/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,34607) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HAVAS v. HUNGARY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Havas v. Hungary
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 7873/03
FEJES v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 64385/12
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present application (see e.g. Pélissier and Sassi v. France, cited above; and Fejes v. Hungary, no. 7873/03, 11 April 2006). - EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 35729/12
BARTA AND DRAJKÓ v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 64385/12
The Court recalls its finding in Barta and Drajkó v. Hungary (no. 35729/12, 17 December 2013); and considers that the remedy suggested by the Government cannot be regarded as an effective one to be exhausted in cases of protracted criminal proceedings. - EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 64385/12
"Charge", for the purposes of Article 6 § 1, may be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", a definition that also corresponds to the test whether "the situation of the [suspect] has been substantially affected" (see, among other authorities, Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63
Neumeister ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 64385/12
In criminal matters, the "reasonable time" referred to in Article 6 § 1 begins to run as soon as a person is "charged"; (see Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, p. 41, § 18, Series A no. 8). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 64385/12
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).