Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 6970/15 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,36972) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ZHANG v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ZHANG v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00
Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 6970/15
The Court reiterates that while Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 94, ECHR 2006-IX; and De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 170, ECHR 2017 (extracts)). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 6970/15
Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings as regards the fairness of the impugned proceedings (see paragraph 74 above), the Court considers that it has examined the main legal question raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the above-mentioned additional complaint (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014). - EGMR, 13.07.2017 - 71891/10
SHULI v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 6970/15
This is particularly true for the guarantees enshrined in Article 6, in view of the prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial with all the guarantees under that Article (see, for a recent reference among many other authorities, Shuli v. Greece, no. 71891/10, § 27, 13 July 2017). - EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 72624/10
TSALKITZIS v. GREECE (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 6970/15
Thus, no provision of domestic law should be interpreted and applied in a manner incompatible with the State's obligations under the Convention (see, for example, Tsalkitzis v. Greece (no. 2), no. 72624/10, § 54, 19 October 2017). - EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09
DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 6970/15
The Court reiterates that while Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 94, ECHR 2006-IX; and De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395/09, § 170, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).
- EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 32734/11
FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)
An issue with regard to a lack of reasoning of judicial decisions under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention will normally arise when the domestic courts ignored a specific, pertinent and important point raised by the applicant (see Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 280, 21 April 2011; Rostomashvili v. Georgia, no. 13185/07, § 59, 8 November 2018; and Zhang v. Ukraine, no. 6970/15, § 73, 13 November 2018). - EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 14132/14
ZAMFIRESCU c. ROUMANIE
Les dispositions pertinentes du code de procédure pénale, en vigueur au moment des faits, relatives à la perquisition sont décrites dans l'arrêt Cacuci et S.C. Virra & Cont Pad S.R.L. c. Roumanie (no 27153/07, §§ 45-48, 17 janvier 2017).