Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NAMND v. SWEDEN

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  From a general point of view the reasonableness of the length of the proceedings must be assessed with reference to the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and that of the authorities before which the case was brought (cf. Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 20.12.2001 - 44704/98

  NORMANN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  The Court reiterates that, in this kind of case, in order to deprive an applicant of his status as a victim, within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, the national authorities must have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and provided redress, e.g. by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see the Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66, Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, 26 June 2001, § 27, Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X, Normann v. Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001 and Ohlen v. Denmark (striking out), no. 63214/00, § 27, 24 February 2005).
• EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 49126/99

  WEJRUP contre la DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning financial crimes, like fraud, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000, Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004, Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004, and Wallin Karlsen (dec.), no. 23523/02, 1 February 2005).

 
• EGMR, 13.05.2004 - 6315/02

  PETERSEN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning financial crimes, like fraud, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000, Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004, Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004, and Wallin Karlsen (dec.), no. 23523/02, 1 February 2005).
• EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 23012/02

  FREDERIKSEN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning financial crimes, like fraud, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000, Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004, Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004, and Wallin Karlsen (dec.), no. 23523/02, 1 February 2005).
• EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 23523/02

  WALLIN KARLSEN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning financial crimes, like fraud, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000, Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004, Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004, and Wallin Karlsen (dec.), no. 23523/02, 1 February 2005).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 63214/00

  OHLEN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  The Court reiterates that, in this kind of case, in order to deprive an applicant of his status as a victim, within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, the national authorities must have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and provided redress, e.g. by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see the Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66, Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, 26 June 2001, § 27, Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X, Normann v. Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001 and Ohlen v. Denmark (striking out), no. 63214/00, § 27, 24 February 2005).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  The Court reiterates that, in this kind of case, in order to deprive an applicant of his status as a victim, within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, the national authorities must have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and provided redress, e.g. by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see the Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66, Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, 26 June 2001, § 27, Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X, Normann v. Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001 and Ohlen v. Denmark (striking out), no. 63214/00, § 27, 24 February 2005).