Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32989/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,56854) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAKANOVIC v. SLOVENIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32989/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32989/02
The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 54645/00
OSINGER v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32989/02
The Court, having in mind its case-law on the subject (see, Gluhar v. Slovenia, no. 14852/03, 21 December 2006, mutatis mutandis, Siegel v. France, no. 36350/97, §§ 33-38, ECHR 2000-XII and Osinger v. Austria, no. 54645/00, 24 March 2005, and), sees no reason to disagree. - EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 14852/03
GLUHAR v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32989/02
The Court, having in mind its case-law on the subject (see, Gluhar v. Slovenia, no. 14852/03, 21 December 2006, mutatis mutandis, Siegel v. France, no. 36350/97, §§ 33-38, ECHR 2000-XII and Osinger v. Austria, no. 54645/00, 24 March 2005, and), sees no reason to disagree. - EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 36350/97
SIEGEL c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32989/02
The Court, having in mind its case-law on the subject (see, Gluhar v. Slovenia, no. 14852/03, 21 December 2006, mutatis mutandis, Siegel v. France, no. 36350/97, §§ 33-38, ECHR 2000-XII and Osinger v. Austria, no. 54645/00, 24 March 2005, and), sees no reason to disagree.
- EGMR, 19.03.2019 - 29278/16
PREBIL v. SLOVENIA
In the absence of any other relevant argument on the part of the Government, the Court cannot consider the mere domestic legal qualification of the impugned proceedings as non-litigious proceedings (see paragraphs 24 and 29 above) to mean that they did not involve a determination of the applicant's civil right within the meaning of Article 6 (see Ferrazzini, cited above, § 24; see also ? akanovic v. Slovenia, no. 32989/02, §§ 14 and 26, 13 December 2007, and ? orgic v. Serbia, no. 34973/06, §§ 48 and 74, 3 November 2011, in which the Court found Article 6 applicable to non-litigious proceedings, namely inheritance proceedings).