Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DAGTEKIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim ...

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 29900/96

  SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 70516/01

  Having found a violation of this provision (paragraphs 31-34 above), the Court considers that there is no need to make a separate ruling on the applicants' complaint raised under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007; Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 73, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 37410/97

  KAMIL UZUN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 70516/01

  Having found a violation of this provision (paragraphs 31-34 above), the Court considers that there is no need to make a separate ruling on the applicants' complaint raised under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007; Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 73, ECHR 2001-VIII).

• EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 40908/05

  FAZLIYSKI v. BULGARIA

  It is also true that this Court has, albeit in different contexts, held that legitimate national security considerations may justify limitations on the rights enshrined in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, § 76, Reports 1998-IV; Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 61, ECHR 2000-II; P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 68, ECHR 2001-IX; Devenney v. the United Kingdom, no. 24265/94, § 26, 19 March 2002; and DaÄŸtekin and Others v. Turkey, no. 70516/01, § 34, 13 December 2007).
• EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 31881/02

  GENCER v. TURKEY

  As regards the first part of the Government's objection, the Court reiterates that it has already examined and rejected similar objections in previous cases (see, in particular, DaÄ?tekin and Others v. Turkey, no. 70516/01, § 22, 13 December 2007, and Gök and Others v. Turkey, nos. 71867/01, 71869/01, 73319/01 and 74858/01, §§ 47- 48, 27 July 2006).