Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SÎRGHI v. ROMANIA

  Art. 7 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 19870/05

  34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001-II; and Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others, cited above, § 108).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 19870/05

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, in particular, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14307/88

  KOKKINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 19870/05

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, in particular, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).

 
• EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04

  KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 19870/05

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, in particular, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 67335/01

  ACHOUR c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 19870/05

  The foregoing considerations are sufficient to enable the Court to conclude that the safety regulations, coupled with the customs developed and consistently applied in the work place, made for an accessible and foreseeable legislation which should have allowed the applicant to anticipate that his acts would make him criminally liable (see also, mutatis mutandis, Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335/01, § 41, ECHR 2006-IV).
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 75909/01

  Sud Fondi S.r.l. u.a. ./. Italien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 19870/05

  The Court makes reference to the well-established principles developed in its case-law in the context of Article 7 of the Convention (see, in particular, Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A; Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193/01 and 77196/01, §§ 33-38, 24 May 2007; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §§ 139-141, ECHR 2008-...; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, §§ 105-110, 20 January 2009; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 92-109, 17 September 2009).