Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 20508/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,51643) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BERZINIS v. LITHUANIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 20508/08
The Court observes that its task under long established case-law is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirely were fair (see, among many other authorities, García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, §§ 28-29, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 20508/08
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 62116/00
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (ausreichende Zeit und Gelegenheit zur …
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 20508/08
It reiterates that the question of time cannot be addressed in abstracto, but only in relation to the circumstances of the case (see for example Mattick v. Germany (dec.), no. 62116/00, ECHR 2005-VII). - EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 23728/03
IVASHCHENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 20508/08
The Court has previously found complaints to be manifestly ill-founded in cases where the applicant's behaviour contributed substantially to the delay in the proceedings and no substantial delays were imputable to the State (see, for example, Ivashchenko v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 23728/03, 24 March 2009). - EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 21987/07
MANEIKIS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 20508/08
As to the Government's plea concerning failure to exhaust the domestic remedies, the Court recalls its conclusion in the case of Maneikis v. Lithuania (no. 21987/07, § 21, 18 January 2011), to the effect that in 2006, when the applicant lodged his application with the Court, there were no effective remedies in Lithuania that the applicant could use to complain about the length of domestic court proceedings.