Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,45008
EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07 (https://dejure.org/2016,45008)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.12.2016 - 10341/07 (https://dejure.org/2016,45008)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Dezember 2016 - 10341/07 (https://dejure.org/2016,45008)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,45008) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SNYATOVSKIY v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

    LETELLIER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07
    Nor can continuation of detention be used to anticipate a custodial sentence (see Dubinskiy v. Russia, no. 48929/08, § 64, 3 July 2014 and Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 51, Series A no. 207).
  • EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 16595/02

    GOLOVKIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07
    The Court accepts that the present case was particularly complex, as it involved several defendants charged on a number of counts and there was a need to ensure the participation and questioning of hundreds of witnesses at the trial hearings (see, mutatis mutandis, Golovkin v. Russia, no. 16595/02, § 39, 3 April 2008 and Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 128, ECHR 2002-VI).
  • EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

    PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07
    The applicable general principles have been summarised in Idalov (cited above § 186); Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC] (no. 49017/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI); Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], (no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II); Grigoryev v. Russia (no. 22663/06, §§ 90 and 92, 23 October 2012); and Yevgeniy Alekseyenko v. Russia (no. 41833/04, §§ 143-44, 27 January 2011).
  • EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 22663/06

    GRIGORYEV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07
    The applicable general principles have been summarised in Idalov (cited above § 186); Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC] (no. 49017/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI); Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], (no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II); Grigoryev v. Russia (no. 22663/06, §§ 90 and 92, 23 October 2012); and Yevgeniy Alekseyenko v. Russia (no. 41833/04, §§ 143-44, 27 January 2011).
  • EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

    IDALOV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07
    The applicable general principles have been summarised in Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC] (no. 23755/07, §§ 84-91, ECHR 2016); Idalov v. Russia [GC] (no. 5826/03, §§ 115-33, 22 May 2012); Zherebin (cited above, §§ 49-54); and Suslov v. Russia (no. 2366/07, §§ 84-86, 29 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 41833/04

    YEVGENIY ALEKSEYENKO v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07
    The applicable general principles have been summarised in Idalov (cited above § 186); Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC] (no. 49017/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI); Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], (no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II); Grigoryev v. Russia (no. 22663/06, §§ 90 and 92, 23 October 2012); and Yevgeniy Alekseyenko v. Russia (no. 41833/04, §§ 143-44, 27 January 2011).
  • EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 2366/07

    SUSLOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07
    The applicable general principles have been summarised in Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC] (no. 23755/07, §§ 84-91, ECHR 2016); Idalov v. Russia [GC] (no. 5826/03, §§ 115-33, 22 May 2012); Zherebin (cited above, §§ 49-54); and Suslov v. Russia (no. 2366/07, §§ 84-86, 29 May 2012).
  • EGMR, 16.01.2024 - 18678/18

    PESHOV AND RISTOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

    The Court further finds it excessive that it took twenty-two days for the appellate court to decide the first applicant's appeal against the order of 26 January 2018 (see, for example, Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 65, 13 December 2016).
  • EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

    JANAKIESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

    The Court has previously found such delays to be excessive (see, for example, Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 65, 13 December 2016, and contrast Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 75, 8 February 2018).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht