Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAISER v. AUSTRIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KAISER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33468/03

  Verletzung der Unschuldsvermutung eines Verstorbenen durch gerichtliche …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 15706/08

  In the past the Court has been called upon to consider the application of Article 6 § 2 to judicial decisions taken following the conclusion of criminal proceedings, either by way of discontinuation or after an acquittal, in proceedings concerning, inter alia, the imposition of civil liability to pay compensation to the victim (see Ringvold v. Norway, no. 34964/97, § 36, ECHR 2003-II; Y. v. Norway, no. 56568/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-II; Orr v. Norway, no. 31283/04, §§ 47-49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v. Turkey, no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19 April 2011; Vulakh and Others v. Russia, no. 33468/03, § 32, 10 January 2012; Diacenco v. Romania, no. 124/04, § 55, 7 February 2012; Lagardère v. France, no. 18851/07, §§ 73 and 76, 12 April 2012; and Constantin Florea v. Romania, no. 21534/05, §§ 50 and 52, 19 June 2012).
• EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 15706/08

  This overriding concern lies at the root of the Court's approach to the applicability of Article 6 § 2 in these cases (Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, § 103-104, ECHR 2013-IV).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 15706/08

  The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness; it falls to the respondent State to establish that these various conditions are satisfied (see, among many other authorities, M.A. v. Austria, no. 4097/13, § 79, 15 January 2015, and Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 21534/05

  CONSTANTIN FLOREA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 15706/08

  In the past the Court has been called upon to consider the application of Article 6 § 2 to judicial decisions taken following the conclusion of criminal proceedings, either by way of discontinuation or after an acquittal, in proceedings concerning, inter alia, the imposition of civil liability to pay compensation to the victim (see Ringvold v. Norway, no. 34964/97, § 36, ECHR 2003-II; Y. v. Norway, no. 56568/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-II; Orr v. Norway, no. 31283/04, §§ 47-49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v. Turkey, no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19 April 2011; Vulakh and Others v. Russia, no. 33468/03, § 32, 10 January 2012; Diacenco v. Romania, no. 124/04, § 55, 7 February 2012; Lagardère v. France, no. 18851/07, §§ 73 and 76, 12 April 2012; and Constantin Florea v. Romania, no. 21534/05, §§ 50 and 52, 19 June 2012).
• EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 56568/00

  Y c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 15706/08

  In the past the Court has been called upon to consider the application of Article 6 § 2 to judicial decisions taken following the conclusion of criminal proceedings, either by way of discontinuation or after an acquittal, in proceedings concerning, inter alia, the imposition of civil liability to pay compensation to the victim (see Ringvold v. Norway, no. 34964/97, § 36, ECHR 2003-II; Y. v. Norway, no. 56568/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-II; Orr v. Norway, no. 31283/04, §§ 47-49, 15 May 2008; Erkol v. Turkey, no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19 April 2011; Vulakh and Others v. Russia, no. 33468/03, § 32, 10 January 2012; Diacenco v. Romania, no. 124/04, § 55, 7 February 2012; Lagardère v. France, no. 18851/07, §§ 73 and 76, 12 April 2012; and Constantin Florea v. Romania, no. 21534/05, §§ 50 and 52, 19 June 2012).

• EGMR, 03.10.2019 - 61985/12

  FLEISCHNER v. GERMANY

  Der Gerichtshof ist bereit zu akzeptieren, dass vorliegend ein mittelbarer Zusammenhang bestand, da die Rechtsanwaltskosten mit den Entwicklungen im Anschluss an das Strafverfahren verbunden waren (…siehe Vella, a.a.O., Rdnr. 43, und Allen, a.a.O., Rdnr. 104; im Gegensatz dazu Kaiser./. Österreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 15706/08, Rdnr. 46, 13.
• EGMR, 20.09.2022 - 57195/17

  Keine Verletzung des Rechts auf privates Familienleben: Maddie McCann's Eltern …

  La Cour note aussi que la Cour suprême n'a pas procédé à une évaluation des éléments de preuve qui avaient été versés au dossier de l'enquête pénale (comparer avec Kaiser c. Autriche (déc.), no 15706/08, § 51, 13 décembre 2016) et qu'elle s'est uniquement penchée sur le motif de classement sans suite afin de fonder ses décisions.