Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IDALOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  IDALOV v. RUSSIA (NO. 2)

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that, where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08

  Where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, however, the Court must apply particularly thorough scrutiny (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336).
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  BOZANO v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08

  It requires at the same time that any deprivation of liberty be in keeping with the purpose of Article 5, namely to protect the individual from arbitrariness (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008).

 
• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 36716/07

  MESUT DENIZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08

  Furthermore, the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny (see Mesut Deniz v. Turkey, no. 36716/07, § 52, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08

  To assess this evidence, the Court adopts the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" but adds that such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX).
• EGMR, 20.06.2013 - 63638/09

  TURLUYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08

  Thus, the mere fact that appropriate steps were not taken to reduce the risk of collusion between alleged perpetrators amounts to a significant shortcoming in the adequacy of the investigation (see, mutatis mutandis, Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 330, ECHR 2007-II, and Turluyeva v. Russia, no. 63638/09, § 107, 20 June 2013).

• EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09

  Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte

  Having regard to its case-law on prison overcrowding (see Mur?.ic, cited above, § 124; Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, §§ 105-09, 13 December 2016, and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 166), and its findings in the similar cases cited above, the Court considers that the first applicant was detained in severely overcrowded conditions which amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 66490/09

  MOCKUTE v. LITHUANIA

  Even so, the Court has already held that, in a situation like this, it remains free to itself evaluate the facts in the light of all the material at its disposal (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336, and Alexandridis, cited above, § 34; also see Klimov v. Russia, no. 54436/14, § 64, 4 October 2016; Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, § 99 in fine, 13 December 2016).
• EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 50992/16

  KULMINSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, concerning excessive length of the detention on remand; Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, 13 December 2016, regarding conditions of transport, and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts), related to defects in the judicial review of detention matters.
• EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 45162/13

  KOLOSYUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 122-139, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning applicant's confinement in a metal cage during court hearings in criminal proceedings; Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, 13 December 2016, dealing with poor conditions of applicant's transport; and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012, related to the lack of a speedy review of detention matters.