Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2016,45012
EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 41858/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,45012)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.12.2016 - 41858/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,45012)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. Dezember 2016 - 41858/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,45012)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,45012) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    IDALOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (7)  

  • EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 37717/05

    Die Kommunikation mit dem Verteidiger darf nicht abgehört werden, egal wann

    The Court finds that the severe overcrowding of the railway carriage, providing practically no personal space to the applicant, amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Guliyev, cited above, §§ 66-70; Sudarkov, cited above, §§ 63-69; M.S. v. Russia, no. 8589/08, §§ 78-79, 10 July 2014; and Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, § 110-12, 13 December 2016, all concerning conditions of transport by rail).
  • EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 66490/09

    MOCKUTÄ- v. LITHUANIA

    Even so, the Court has already held that, in a situation like this, it remains free to itself evaluate the facts in the light of all the material at its disposal (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336, and Alexandridis, cited above, § 34; also see Klimov v. Russia, no. 54436/14, § 64, 4 October 2016; Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, § 99 in fine, 13 December 2016).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 33128/08

    FARRAKHOV c. RUSSIE

    La Cour rappelle avoir déjà conclu dans de nombreuses affaires à la violation de l'article 3 de la Convention à raison des conditions de détention dans des maisons d'arrêt (voir, par exemple, Dudchenko c. Russie, no 37717/05, §§ 116-123, 7 novembre 2017, Vyatkin c. Russie, no 18813/06, §§ 36-44, 11 avril 2013, Mayzit c. Russie, no 63378/00, §§ 34-43, 20 janvier 2005, Ananyev et autres, précité, §§ 160-166, Zentsov et autres c. Russie, no 35297/05, §§ 38-45, 23 octobre 2012, et Kolunov c. Russie, no 26436/05, §§ 30-38, 9 octobre 2012), ainsi que dans des centres de détention provisoire (voir, par exemple, Idalov c. Russie (no 2), no 41858/08, §§ 105-109, 13 décembre 2016, Sergeyev c. Russie, no 41090/05, §§ 48-51, 6 octobre 2015, Shkarupa c. Russie, no36461/05, §§ 54-57, 15 janvier 2015, et Shishkov c. Russie, no 26746/05, §§ 89-94, 20 février 2014), et à raison des conditions de transport de détenus (voir, par exemple, en ce qui concerne le transport dans des fourgons, Radzhab Magomedov c. Russie, no 20933/08, §§ 59-62, 20 décembre 2016, Korkin c. Russie, no 48416/09, §§ 70-75, 12 novembre 2015, et M.S. c. Russie, no 8589/08, §§ 71-77, 10 juillet 2014, et, en ce qui concerne le transport dans des wagons, Dudchenko, précité, §§ 126-132, et les arrêts qui y sont cités).
  • EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 45162/13

    KOLOSYUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 122-139, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning applicant's confinement in a metal cage during court hearings in criminal proceedings; Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, 13 December 2016, dealing with poor conditions of applicant's transport; and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012, related to the lack of a speedy review of detention matters.
  • EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 50992/16

    KULMINSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, concerning excessive length of the detention on remand; Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, 13 December 2016, regarding conditions of transport, and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts), related to defects in the judicial review of detention matters.
  • EGMR, 12.04.2018 - 35884/07

    FRENKEL AND MAKHMUTOVA v. RUSSIA

    The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of pre-trial detention (see, for example, Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012), as well as concerning other complaints communicated to the Government under well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, 13 December 2016, and Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 15.02.2018 - 14821/16

    SELIVANOV v. RUSSIA

    Therefore, and in the absence of effective domestic remedies for such complaints (see Idalov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 41858/08, §§ 113-115, 13 December 2016), the application, which should have been lodged within six months after the end of the period of transport in those conditions, was lodged belatedly.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht