Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 60627/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,45001) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YUNZEL v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 60627/09
To this end, the Court will examine the declaration carefully in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007; and WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007).
- EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 38750/20
MURACA v. ITALY
In these circumstances, there is insufficient evidence that the temporary unavailability of repairing the dental implant resulted in suffering attracting applicability of Article 3 of the Convention (see Györgypál, cited above, § 56, and Aleksandr Vladimirovich Smirnov v. Ukraine, no. 69250/11, § 52, 13 March 2014; see also, a contrario, Yunzel v. Russia, no. 60627/09, § 47, 13 December 2016, and Dragan v. Romania, no. 65158/09, §§ 86-94, 2 February 2016).