Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03, 19089/04, 27800/04, 42059/04, 43505/04, 43538/04, 3614/05, 30906/05, 39901/05, 524/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,65326
EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03, 19089/04, 27800/04, 42059/04, 43505/04, 43538/04, 3614/05, 30906/05, 39901/05, 524/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,65326)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.01.2010 - 14290/03, 19089/04, 27800/04, 42059/04, 43505/04, 43538/04, 3614/05, 30906/05, 39901/05, 524/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,65326)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Januar 2010 - 14290/03, 19089/04, 27800/04, 42059/04, 43505/04, 43538/04, 3614/05, 30906/05, 39901/05, 524/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,65326)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,65326) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 56869/00

    LARIOSHINA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03
    The domestic judgments dismissing the applicants' claims and other materials at the Court's disposal do not disclose any unlawfulness or arbitrariness and it is not for the Court to reassess the question of the applicants' entitlement to social benefits under domestic law (see Larioshina v. Russia (dec.), no. 56869/00, 23 April 2002).
  • EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

    BURDOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03
    The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

    RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03
    A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character, such as correction of fundamental defects or miscarriage of justice (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 51-52, ECHR 2003-IX).
  • EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

    RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03
    The reasonableness of such delay is to be determined having regard in particular to the complexity of the enforcement proceedings, the applicant's own behaviour and that of the competent authorities, the amount and the nature of court award (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).
  • EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 2999/03

    DOVGUCHITS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03
    Accordingly, the Government's objection should be dismissed in line with the Court's decisions in numerous similar cases (see Dovguchits v. Russia, no.2999/03, §§ 19-24, 7 June 2007, and Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 19, 8 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

    KULKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03
    Accordingly, the Government's objection should be dismissed in line with the Court's decisions in numerous similar cases (see Dovguchits v. Russia, no.2999/03, §§ 19-24, 7 June 2007, and Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 19, 8 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04

    BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03
    The Court reiterates that it recently assessed the effectiveness of the remedies referred to by the Government and concluded that no effective domestic remedy was available in respect of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of judgments (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, §§ 101-116, ECHR 2009-...).
  • EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 7873/09

    SHEYMAN v. RUSSIA

    In accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of the Court, the Court decides to consider the applications in a single judgment, given their similar factual and legal background (see Kazakevich and 9 other "Army Pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 14290/03 et al., § 15, 14 January 2010).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht