Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 74454/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,48807) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WOZNIAK v. POLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 3 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 74454/01
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 74454/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 19.10.2000 - 45995/99
RUTKOWSKI contre la POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 74454/01
Given the independence of the legal profession from the State, the conduct of the defence is essentially a matter between the defendant and his or her counsel, whether counsel be appointed under a legal aid scheme or be privately financed, and, as such, cannot, other than in special circumstances, incur the State's liability under the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Daud v. Portugal judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, p. 749, § 38; Tuzinski v. Poland (dec), no. 40140/98, 30.03.1999; Rutkowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 45995/99, ECHR 2000-XI).It will depend on the circumstances of the case whether the relevant authorities should take action (see the above-mentioned Daud judgment, p. 750, §§ 40-42) and whether, taking the proceedings as a whole, the defence may be regarded as "practical and effective" as required by Article 6 § 3(c) (see Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, § 33; Goddi v. Italy judgment of 9 April 1984, Series A no. 76, p. 11, § 27; Rutkowski v. Poland (dec), no. 45995/99, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 74454/01
In particular, it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and insofar as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999- I). - EGMR, 30.03.1999 - 40140/98
TUZINSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 74454/01
Given the independence of the legal profession from the State, the conduct of the defence is essentially a matter between the defendant and his or her counsel, whether counsel be appointed under a legal aid scheme or be privately financed, and, as such, cannot, other than in special circumstances, incur the State's liability under the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, the Daud v. Portugal judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, p. 749, § 38; Tuzinski v. Poland (dec), no. 40140/98, 30.03.1999; Rutkowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 45995/99, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 09.04.1984 - 8966/80
GODDI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 74454/01
It will depend on the circumstances of the case whether the relevant authorities should take action (see the above-mentioned Daud judgment, p. 750, §§ 40-42) and whether, taking the proceedings as a whole, the defence may be regarded as "practical and effective" as required by Article 6 § 3(c) (see Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, § 33; Goddi v. Italy judgment of 9 April 1984, Series A no. 76, p. 11, § 27; Rutkowski v. Poland (dec), no. 45995/99, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74
ARTICO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 74454/01
It will depend on the circumstances of the case whether the relevant authorities should take action (see the above-mentioned Daud judgment, p. 750, §§ 40-42) and whether, taking the proceedings as a whole, the defence may be regarded as "practical and effective" as required by Article 6 § 3(c) (see Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, § 33; Goddi v. Italy judgment of 9 April 1984, Series A no. 76, p. 11, § 27; Rutkowski v. Poland (dec), no. 45995/99, ECHR 2000-XI).