Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45202/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16574) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VOLODARSKIY v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) No violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Volodarskiy v. Russia
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45202/04
Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45202/04
Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see, among many authorities, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 14760/94, §§ 107 et seq., Reports 1998-VIII; Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts); Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, §§ 107-08, 26 January 2006; and Shishkin v. Russia, no. 18280/04, §§ 95-96, 7 July 2011). - EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 18280/04
SHISHKIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45202/04
Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see, among many authorities, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 14760/94, §§ 107 et seq., Reports 1998-VIII; Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts); Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, §§ 107-08, 26 January 2006; and Shishkin v. Russia, no. 18280/04, §§ 95-96, 7 July 2011). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45202/04
The Court reiterates that allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence (see, mutatis mutandis, Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 30, Series A no. 269). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45202/04
Finally, Article 6 does not grant the accused an unlimited right to secure the appearance of witnesses in court and it is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to hear a witness (see, among many other authorities, Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, § 89, Series A no. 158).