Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45383/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,14890) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45383/07
In this respect the present case is different from those where the burden of proof was regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45383/07
In these circumstances, and also noting that an "official and effective investigation" capable of establishing the causes of death and identifying and punishing those responsible must be carried out of the authorities" own motion (see, for example, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 74, ECHR 2002-II, and Tsintsabadze v. Georgia, no. 35403/06, § 85, 15 February 2011), the Court does not consider that the applicant was required, for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, to explicitly seek a third review of the case by prosecuting authorities at higher levels by means of a petition under the Prosecution Service Act 2001. - EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06
TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45383/07
In these circumstances, and also noting that an "official and effective investigation" capable of establishing the causes of death and identifying and punishing those responsible must be carried out of the authorities" own motion (see, for example, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 74, ECHR 2002-II, and Tsintsabadze v. Georgia, no. 35403/06, § 85, 15 February 2011), the Court does not consider that the applicant was required, for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, to explicitly seek a third review of the case by prosecuting authorities at higher levels by means of a petition under the Prosecution Service Act 2001. - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 45383/07
The investigation should be independent, accessible to the victim's family, carried out with reasonable promptness and expedition and there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of it (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, §§ 113-114, ECHR 2001-III, and Juozaitiene and Bikulcius v. Lithuania, nos. 70659/01 and 74371/01, § 86, 24 April 2008, with further references).