Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SEMSI ONEN v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) No violation of Art. 2 in respect of killing of applicant's relatives Violation of Art. 2 on account of lack of effective investigation No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary ...

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 15.05.1995 - 22876/93
• EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 22876/93

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 22876/93

  Deciding on an equitable basis and noting the awards made in previous cases from south-east Turkey concerning complaints under Articles 2 and 13 related to the death of a close family member (see, notably, the Güleç v. Turkey judgment of 27 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1734, § 88; the above-mentioned Ergi judgment, § 110, Kaya judgment, § 122, and Yasa judgment, § 124; and also OÄ?ur v. Turkey [G.C.], no. 21594/93, ECHR 1999-V, § 98), the Court awards EUR 16, 000 each to Semsi and Mekiye Önen and EUR 13, 000 each to Ihsan, Ercan, Mehmet Nuri, Medine, Sultan, Sevgi, Iskender, Melek and Hamdullah Önen.
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23657/94

  ÇAKICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 22876/93

  In accordance with the principles in its case-law, it rejects the entirety of the applicant's claim under this heading (cf. Çakıcı v. Turkey [G.C.], no. 23657/94, ECHR 1999-IV, § 127).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 22876/93

  The Court recalls that it takes cognisance of preliminary objections in so far as the State in question has already raised them, at least in substance and with sufficient clarity, before the Commission, in principle at the stage of the initial examination of admissibility (see the Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece judgment of 9 December 1994 Series A no. 301-B, p. 77, § 32).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 22876/93

  The Court recalls that, according to its case-law, the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force by, inter alia, agents of the State (see the McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 49, § 161; and also the Kaya v. Turkey judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 322, 324, §§ 78, 86).

• EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09

  Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte

  The Court reiterates that where a violation of the right to life is alleged, the Convention institutions have accepted applications from relatives of the deceased (see Karpylenko v. Ukraine, no. 15509/12, § 73, 11 February 2016, and ?žemsi Önen v. Turkey, no. 22876/93, 14 May 2002).
• EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 36832/97

  SOLOMOU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  For example applications have been brought by a deceased person's wife (Aytekin v. Turkey, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII), a deceased person's mother (Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, 27 February 2001), a deceased person's father (Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001-III (extracts)) and a deceased person's brother and sister (see, respectively, Ergi v. Turkey, judgment of 28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, and Semsi Önen v. Turkey, no. 22876/93, 14 May 2002).
• EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 29971/04

  KATS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  La Cour rappelle d'emblée que, dès lors qu'une violation du droit à la vie est alléguée, les organes de la Convention acceptent des requêtes des parents du défunt, par exemple son épouse (Aytekin c. Turquie, 23 septembre 1998, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1998-VII), sa mère (Çiçek c. Turquie, no 25704/94, 27 février 2001), son père (Hugh Jordan c. Royaume-Uni, no 24746/94, CEDH 2001-III), son frère (Ergi c. Turquie, 28 juillet 1998, Recueil 1998-IV) ou sa sÅ“ur (Semsi Önen c. Turquie, no 22876/93, 14 mai 2002).