Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOSTOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KOSTOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2782/12

  NARODNI LIST D.D. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 66581/12

  As it is in the nature of non-pecuniary damage that it does not lend itself to precise calculation, Rule 60 does not prevent the Court from examining claims in that regard which the applicants did not quantify but left the amount to its discretion (see Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 48, ECHR 2004-I, and Narodni List D.D. v. Croatia, no. 2782/12, § 78, 8 November 2018).
• EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98

  MAESTRI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 66581/12

  As it is in the nature of non-pecuniary damage that it does not lend itself to precise calculation, Rule 60 does not prevent the Court from examining claims in that regard which the applicants did not quantify but left the amount to its discretion (see Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 48, ECHR 2004-I, and Narodni List D.D. v. Croatia, no. 2782/12, § 78, 8 November 2018).
• EGMR, 04.07.2019 - 47166/09

  SVITLANA ILCHENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 66581/12

  The Court reiterates that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited, and that it is in the first place for the national authorities, notably the courts, to interpret and apply such law (see Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, § 82, ECHR 2000-XII, and Svitlana Ilchenko v. Ukraine, no. 47166/09, § 66, 4 July 2019).

• EGMR - 9313/21 (anhängig)

  STEFANOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The application concerns a complaint, of the type examined in Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020), that the compensation awarded to the applicants for their land expropriated for public needs was very low.

  Was the compensation awarded to the applicants reasonably related to their expropriated land's value (see Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020)? Are the data submitted by the applicants sufficient to show that the market value of their land could have been significantly higher?.

• EGMR - 4173/20 (anhängig)

  NEVADA TOURS 2004 AD v. BULGARIA and 1 other application

  The applications are of the type examined in Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020) and concern allegedly low amount of compensation following expropriation.

  Was the compensation awarded to the applicant companies reasonably related to the expropriated land's value (see Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020)? Are the data submitted by the applicant companies sufficient to show that the market value of the plots could have been significantly higher?.

• EGMR - 37520/21 (anhängig)

  ANTONOV v. BULGARIA

  The application is of the type examined in Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020) and concerns allegedly low amount of compensation following expropriation.

  Was the compensation awarded to the applicant reasonably related to the expropriated land's value (see Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020)? Are there sufficient objective data showing that there were considerable discrepancies between the compensation set and the actual market value of the expropriated land?.

 
• EGMR - 5113/20 (anhängig)

  MADZHAROV v. BULGARIA

  The application is of the type examined in Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020) and concerns allegedly low amount of compensation following the expropriation of land owned by the applicant.

  Was the compensation awarded to the applicant reasonably related to the expropriated land's value (see Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020)? Are the data submitted by the applicant sufficient to show that the market value of the plot could have been significantly higher?.

• EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 8706/18

  OSMANI v. ALBANIA

  66581/12 and 25054/15, § 105, 14 May 2020; and Todorov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos.
• EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 265/17

  YORDANOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  66581/12 and 25054/15, § 105, 14 May 2020).
• EGMR, 15.12.2020 - 31678/17

  NATIONAL MOVEMENT EKOGLASNOST v. BULGARIA

  66581/12 and 25054/15, §§ 77 and 86, 14 May 2020).
• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 56681/15

  HRISTOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The case is of the type examined in Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020) and concerns the adequacy of compensation for expropriation under the State Property Act.
• EGMR, 03.05.2022 - 14642/15

  DIMOV v. BULGARIA

  66581/12 and 25054/15, §§ 110-11, 14 May 2020).
• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 56383/15

  BOZHILOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The case is of the type examined in Kostov and Others v. Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020) and concerns the adequacy of compensation for expropriation under the State Property Act.