Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES c. FRANCE

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Non-violation de l'art. 10 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES v. FRANCE

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  No violation of Art. 10 (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (französisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 71111/01
• EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (19)

• EGMR, 25.06.2002 - 51279/99

  Frankreich wegen Verletzung der Pressefreiheit zu Schadensersatz verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  The Court reiterates that it is the duty of the press to impart - in a manner consistent with its "duties and responsibilities" - information and ideas on all matters of public interest; not only does the press have the task of imparting such information and ideas, but the public also has a right to receive them (see, among other authorities, Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, § 55, ECHR 2002-V).

  As stated in paragraph 41 of the judgment, it is the duty of the press to impart - in a manner consistent with its duties and responsibilities - information and ideas on all matters of public interest; not only does the press have the task of imparting such information and ideas: the public also has a right to receive them (see, among other authorities, Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, § 55, ECHR 2002-V).

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  Restrictions on freedom of expression in this area must be construed strictly (see, among other authorities, Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 74, 12 July 2001) and the national margin of appreciation is circumscribed by the interest of democratic society in enabling the press to exercise its vital role of "public watchdog" (see, for example, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95

  Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  Every penalty, by its very nature, has a deterrent effect (on the clearly "chilling" effect the fear of sanctions has on the exercise by journalists of their freedom of expression, see, mutatis mutandis, Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 50, ECHR 1999-VII; Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 54, ECHR 2002-II; Goodwin, cited above, p. 500, § 39; Elci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, § 714, 13 November 2003).

 
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

  FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  Restrictions on freedom of expression in this area must be construed strictly (see, among other authorities, Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 74, 12 July 2001) and the national margin of appreciation is circumscribed by the interest of democratic society in enabling the press to exercise its vital role of "public watchdog" (see, for example, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-III).
• EGMR, 21.03.2002 - 31611/96

  NIKULA c. FINLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  Every penalty, by its very nature, has a deterrent effect (on the clearly "chilling" effect the fear of sanctions has on the exercise by journalists of their freedom of expression, see, mutatis mutandis, Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 50, ECHR 1999-VII; Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 54, ECHR 2002-II; Goodwin, cited above, p. 500, § 39; Elci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, § 714, 13 November 2003).
• EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 25091/94

  SAHiN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  Every penalty, by its very nature, has a deterrent effect (on the clearly "chilling" effect the fear of sanctions has on the exercise by journalists of their freedom of expression, see, mutatis mutandis, Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 50, ECHR 1999-VII; Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 54, ECHR 2002-II; Goodwin, cited above, p. 500, § 39; Elci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, § 714, 13 November 2003).
• EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 42409/98

  SCHÜSSEL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  The Court has already considered the publication of photographs concerning public figures (Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, ECHR 2004-VI) or political personalities (Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002).
• EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 23145/93

  ELÇI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  Every penalty, by its very nature, has a deterrent effect (on the clearly "chilling" effect the fear of sanctions has on the exercise by journalists of their freedom of expression, see, mutatis mutandis, Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 50, ECHR 1999-VII; Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 54, ECHR 2002-II; Goodwin, cited above, p. 500, § 39; Elci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, § 714, 13 November 2003).
• EGMR, 11.01.2000 - 31457/96

  NEWS VERLAGS GmbH & Co. KG v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  In those cases the Court has heard relating to the balance between the protection of private life and freedom of expression, it has always emphasised the contribution the publication of photographs or articles in the press made to the general debate (see Tammer, cited above, §§ 59 et seq.; News Verlags GmbH & CoKG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, §§ 52 et seq., ECHR 2000-I; and Krone Verlags GmbH & CoKG, cited above, §§ 33 et seq.).
• EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 73604/01

  Monnat / Schweiz "L´honneur perdu de la Suisse"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 71111/01

  The fundamental principles concerning this case, which are well-established in the Court's case-law, are as follows (see, for example, Monnat v. Switzerland, no. 73604/01, § 55, ECHR 2006-...):.
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 25390/94

  REKVÉNYI c. HONGRIE
• EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97

  THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG
• EGMR, 30.03.2004 - 53984/00

  RADIO FRANCE ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85

  Oberschlick ./. Österreich
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 41205/98

  TAMMER v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 34315/96

  KRONE VERLAG GmbH & Co. KG v. AUSTRIA

• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Es handelt sich hier aber um einen Bereich, in dem der Schutz des guten Rufs und der Rechte anderer eine besondere Bedeutung einnimmt, weil die Fotos sehr persönliche oder sogar intime Informationen über eine Person oder ihre Familie enthalten können (H. a.a.O., Rdnr. 59, Hachette Filipacchi Associés ./. Frankreich, Nr. 71111/01, Rdnr. 42, CEDH 2007-VII;… und Eerikäinen und andere ./. Finnland, Nr. 3514/02, Rdnr. 70, 10. Februar 2009).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 48718/11

  PINTO COELHO c. PORTUGAL (N° 2)

  50. Lors de l'examen de la nécessité de l'ingérence dans une société démocratique en vue de la « protection de la réputation ou des droits d'autrui », la Cour peut être amenée à vérifier si les autorités nationales ont ménagé un juste équilibre dans la protection de deux valeurs garanties par la Convention et qui peuvent apparaître en conflit dans certaines affaires : à savoir, d'une part, la liberté d'expression telle que protégée par l'article 10 et, d'autre part, le droit au respect de la vie privée tel que garanti par les dispositions de l'article 8 (Hachette Filipacchi Associés c. France, no 71111/01, § 43, 14 juin 2007, MGN Limited, précité, § 142, et Axel Springer AG, précité, § 84).