Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.09.2000 - 34447/97 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,39762) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SZOFER v. POLAND
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.09.2000 - 34447/97
- EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 34447/97
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
W. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2000 - 34447/97
Where such grounds are "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, the W. v. Switzerland judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30; the I.A. v. France judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VII, p. 2978, § 102). - EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62
Stögmüller ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2000 - 34447/97
The persistence of reasonable suspicion that the person arrested has committed an offence is a condition sine qua non for the validity of the continued detention (see the Stögmüller v. Austria judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, p. 40, § 4), but, after a certain lapse of time, it no longer suffices; the Court must then establish whether the other grounds cited by the judicial authorities continue to justify the deprivation of liberty. - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63
Neumeister ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2000 - 34447/97
It is essentially on the basis of the reasons given in these decisions and of the true facts mentioned by the applicant in his appeals, that the Court is called upon to decide whether or not there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see, inter alia, the Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 37, §§ 4-5).