Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3205/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,61518) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CROITORU v. ROMANIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01
STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3205/03
Because of their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is in the public interest on social or economic grounds, and the Court will generally respect the legislature's policy choice unless it is "manifestly without reasonable foundation" (Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom, [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 52, ECHR 2006-VI).
- EGMR, 15.02.2024 - 2412/19
SHYLINA v. UKRAINE
In the Court's view, the applicant's complaints are to be examined from the standpoint of the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention regarding control of the use of property (see Croitoru v. Romania (dec.), no. 3205/03, 14 September 2010). - EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 52943/10
DAMJANAC v. CROATIA
Therefore, the Court must satisfy itself that the legislation regulating the conditions for payment of the pension is clear, precise and foreseeable with regard to the specific legal requirements (see Croitoru v. Romania (dec.), no. 3205/03, 14 September 2010).