Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 32347/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,58998
EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 32347/02 (https://dejure.org/2008,58998)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.10.2008 - 32347/02 (https://dejure.org/2008,58998)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Oktober 2008 - 32347/02 (https://dejure.org/2008,58998)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,58998) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MEHMET EREN v. TURKEY

    Art. 3, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 32347/02
    The Court reiterates that Article 3 enshrines one of the most fundamental values of democratic societies, making no provision for exceptions, and no derogation from it is permissible under Article 15 § 2 (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

    KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 32347/02
    A full description of the domestic law and practice at the relevant time may be found in Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/06 and 57834/00, §§ 95-99, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 31.01.2008 - 26803/02

    SÜLEYMAN ERKAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 32347/02
    Such proof may, however, follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, among many others, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV; Süleyman Erkan v. Turkey, no. 26803/02, § 31, 31 January 2008)).
  • EKMR, 30.06.1997 - 25091/94

    SAHiN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 32347/02
    Even if the applicant's allegations are inaccurate, that is to say if a medical examination was indeed carried out, no decisive importance can be attributed to the resultant report, since the Court has already held that collective medical examinations can only be described as superficial and cursory (see Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X; Elci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, § 642, 13 November 2003).
  • EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 29999/04

    MAMASAKHLISI v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA

    In particular, such examinations have to be carried out by a properly qualified doctor (out of the hearing and sight of non-medical staff), and the report on it has to include not only details of any injuries found, but the explanations given by the patient as to how they occurred and the opinion of the doctor as to whether the injuries are consistent with those explanations (see Akkoç, cited above, § 118; Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, § 40, 14 October 2008, and Zalyan and Others v. Armenia, nos. 36894/04 and 3521/07, § 260, 17 March 2016).
  • EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 29105/03

    VOLKAN ÖZDEMIR v. TURKEY

    As such, the Court considers that the medical reports in question cannot be relied on as cogent evidence for proving or disproving that the applicant was ill-treated (see, for example, Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, §§ 40-42, 14 October 2008).
  • EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 6291/05

    YANANER v. TURKEY

    Further, every detained person should be examined on his or her own and the results of that examination, as well as relevant statements by the detainee and the doctor's conclusions, should be formally recorded by the doctor (see Akkoç, § 118, cited above, and Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, § 40, 14 October 2008).
  • EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

    DILEK ASLAN v. TURKEY

    As such, the Court considers that the medical reports in question cannot be relied on as evidence for proving or disproving the applicant's allegations of ill-treatment (see Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, §§ 40-42, 14 October 2008; Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 53, 21 October 2008; and Balliktas v. Turkey, no. 7070/03, § 28, 20 October 2009).
  • EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 1915/03

    ARZU v. TURKEY

    Consequently, the Court considers that the applicant has not submitted any medical evidence of either physical injuries to his person or mental trauma consistent with having been tortured and ill-treated as alleged (see, among others, Yasar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 55938/00, 22 June 2006; Künkül v. Turkey (dec.), no. 57177/00, 30 November 2006; S.T. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28310/95, 9 November 1999; and, a contrario, Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, § 43, 14 October 2008).
  • EGMR, 17.03.2009 - 15828/03

    SALMANOGLU AND POLATTAS v. TURKEY

    Further, every detained person should be examined on his or her own and the results of that examination, as well as relevant statements by the detainee and the doctor's conclusions, should be formally recorded by the doctor (see Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X; Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, § 40, 14 October 2008).
  • EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 23909/03

    DESDE v. TURKEY

    Further, every detained person should be examined on his or her own and the results of that examination, as well as relevant statements by the detainee and the doctor's conclusions, should be formally recorded by the doctor (see Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X; Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, § 40, 14 October 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 71912/01

    BÖKE AND KANDEMIR v. TURKEY

    As such, the Court considers that the medical reports in question cannot be relied on as evidence for proving or disproving that the applicant was ill-treated (see Mehmet Eren v. Turkey, no. 32347/02, §§ 40-42, 14 October 2008, and Gülbahar and Others v. Turkey, no. 5264/03, § 53, 21 October 2008)[4].
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht