Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 33617/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,59122) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALIEV v. UKRAINE (No. 2)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 41707/98
KHOKHLICH v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 33617/02
The Court recalls that in the case of Khokhlich (Khokhlich v. Ukraine, no. 41707/98, 29 April 2003) it found that several complaints about the conditions of detention by the applicant and his mother filed with the governor of the relevant detention facility were sufficient to make the authorities aware of the applicant's situation and to give them an opportunity to examine the conditions of the applicant's detention and, if appropriate, to offer redress. - EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01
MELNIK v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 33617/02
Similar conclusions were reached by the Court in a number of other cases (see Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, ECHR 2001-XI (extracts); Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, § 70, 28 March 2006).
- EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 23893/03
KAVERZIN v. UKRAINE
Relying on the Court's decisions in Kalashnikov v. Russia (no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), Khokhlich v. Ukraine (no. 41707/98, 29 April 2003), Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006), Vinokurov v. Ukraine and Russia ((dec.), no. 2937/04, 16 October 2007), and Aliev v. Ukraine (No. 2) ((dec.), no. 33617/02, 14 October 2008), the Government argued that by the terms of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention the applicant had been required to raise the complaint of inadequate medical assistance before the national authorities so that they could have had an opportunity to investigate the conditions of the applicant's detention and, if his complaint had been found to be well-substantiated, to suggest ways of improving the situation.