Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 70930/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,70194) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BLUMBERGA v. LATVIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (ratione materiae) Preliminary objection joined to merits No violation of P1-1 Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 70930/01
- EGMR, 10.09.2015 - 70930/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98
GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 70930/01
Where that has been established, the concept of "legitimate expectation" can come into play, which must be of a nature more concrete than a mere hope and be based on a legal provision or a legal act such as a judicial decision (see Draon, cited above, § 65, and Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794/98, § 73, ECHR 2002-VII). - EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98
M.C. c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 70930/01
Furthermore, where the interference is of a criminal nature, this obligation will in addition require that the authorities conduct an effective criminal investigation and, if appropriate, prosecution (see, mutatis mutandis, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 151-153, ECHR 2003-XII). - EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 70930/01
"Possessions" within the meaning of the above provision may be either "existing possessions" or assets, including claims, in respect of which the applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, § 51, Series A no. 222, and Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 35, ECHR 2004-IX). - EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 70930/01
The Court reiterates that the concept of "possessions" in Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 has an autonomous meaning and that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in substance guarantees the right of property (see Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979,, § 63, Series A no. 31).