Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 45196/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63966) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VOLCHKOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95
T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 45196/04
The Court reiterates that, where an arguable breach of one or more of the rights under the Convention is in issue, there should be available to the victim a mechanism for establishing any liability on the part of State officials or bodies for that breach (see T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00
BLECIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 45196/04
Despite the court proceedings brought by the applicant in 2004, the Court considers that the applicant's grievances concerning the first period of the detention from 1996 to April 1998 are incompatible ratione temporis, since the Convention entered into force in respect of Russia on 5 May 1998 (see Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 70, ECHR 2006-III, and Brovchenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 1603/02, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99
COBZARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 45196/04
The scope of the obligation under Article 13 varies depending on the nature of the applicant's complaint under the Convention (see, for instance, Muminov v. Russia, no. 42502/06, § 101, 11 December 2008, and Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 82, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 13.09.2007 - 26744/05
CANALI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 45196/04
In addition, it is not apparent that the grievance arising from the conditions of detention was capable of constituting a criminal offence, which could be attributable to any public official and would thus require, in the context of Article 3 of the Convention, a criminal inquiry or even a full-fledged investigation (see, for comparison, Canali v. France (dec.), no. 26744/05, 13 September 2007). - EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
PEREZ c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 45196/04
Thus, the right to have third parties prosecuted or sentenced for a criminal offence cannot be asserted independently: it must be indissociable from the victim's exercise of a right to bring civil proceedings in domestic law, even if only to secure symbolic reparation or to protect a civil right (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I).