Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TZILIVAKI AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 30.10.2001 - 37794/97

  PANNULLO ET FORTE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 23082/07

  As concerns the subject-matter of the present case, there is no case-law indicating that in any general sense Article 8 requires Contracting States to ensure identification, exhumation or burial of remains on request of family members (see, for differing outcomes in cases concerning widely differing facts, Pannullo and Forte v. France, no. 37794/97, §§ 35-40, ECHR 2001-X; Hadri-Vionnet v. Switzerland, no. 55525/00, §§ 50-62, 14 February 2008; Elli Poluhas Dodsbo v Sweden 61564/2000, §§ 23-29, 17 January 2006; Kemal Sisman v Turkey, 46352/10, 21 January 2014).
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 46544/99

  Fall K. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 23082/07

  In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, § 62, ECHR 2002-I).
• EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 46352/10

  SISMAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 23082/07

  As concerns the subject-matter of the present case, there is no case-law indicating that in any general sense Article 8 requires Contracting States to ensure identification, exhumation or burial of remains on request of family members (see, for differing outcomes in cases concerning widely differing facts, Pannullo and Forte v. France, no. 37794/97, §§ 35-40, ECHR 2001-X; Hadri-Vionnet v. Switzerland, no. 55525/00, §§ 50-62, 14 February 2008; Elli Poluhas Dodsbo v Sweden 61564/2000, §§ 23-29, 17 January 2006; Kemal Sisman v Turkey, 46352/10, 21 January 2014).

 
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 23082/07

  While these obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for private life or family life (see, inter alia, Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 32, Series A no. 32), the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with Article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the Contracting States" margin of appreciation, whether the obligations on the State are positive or negative.
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 23082/07

  Insofar as the applicants invoked the procedural obligation under Article 2 of the Convention, the Court would recall that this obligation concerns primarily the duty of the authorities to carry out effective investigations to uncover the fate of victims of violent or unlawful death and hold perpetrators to account where appropriate (see amongst many authorities, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 37575/04

  BOULOIS c. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 23082/07

  Insofar as the applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention of lack of access to court, the Court finds no indication of any dispute about a civil right or obligation that would bring this provision into play (Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2012).