Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SPAHIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Respondent ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SPAHIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA and 15 other applications

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 20514/15

  Admittedly, a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances, but the delay may not be such as to impair the essence of the right protected under Article 6 § 1 (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002 III, and Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 41, 30 June 2005).
• EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 11931/03

  TETERINY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 20514/15

  Admittedly, a delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances, but the delay may not be such as to impair the essence of the right protected under Article 6 § 1 (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002 III, and Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 41, 30 June 2005).
• EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 2269/06

  R. KACAPOR AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 20514/15

  Notably, the Court has held that it is not open to authorities to cite lack of funds as an excuse for not honouring a judgment debt (see ibid., § 39; see also R. Kacapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269/06 et al., § 114, 15 January 2008, and Arbaciauskiene v. Lithuania, no. 2971/08, § 87, 1 March 2016).

 
• EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 60041/08

  GREENS ET M.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 20514/15

  It follows that a judgment in which the Court finds a breach imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction under Article 41, but also to implement, under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers, appropriate general and/or individual measures (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 198, ECHR 2004-II, and Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, § 106, ECHR 2010 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 2971/08

  ARBACIAUSKIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 20514/15

  Notably, the Court has held that it is not open to authorities to cite lack of funds as an excuse for not honouring a judgment debt (see ibid., § 39; see also R. Kacapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269/06 et al., § 114, 15 January 2008, and Arbaciauskiene v. Lithuania, no. 2971/08, § 87, 1 March 2016).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 20514/15

  It follows that a judgment in which the Court finds a breach imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation not just to pay those concerned the sums awarded by way of just satisfaction under Article 41, but also to implement, under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers, appropriate general and/or individual measures (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 198, ECHR 2004-II, and Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, § 106, ECHR 2010 (extracts)).

• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 4954/15

  ZAHIROVIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  Notably, the Court has held that it is not open to authorities to cite lack of funds as an excuse for not honouring a judgment debt (see, also, Spahic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 20514/15 and 15 others, § 25, 14 November 2017, and Kunic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 68955/12 and 15 others, § 26, 14 November 2017).

  20514/15 and 15 others, § 38, 14 November 2017, and in Kunic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos.

• EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 13064/18

  VEGH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  20514/15 and 15 others, § 41, 14 November 2017).
• EGMR - 43201/22 (anhängig)

  KAROVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA and 1 other application

  Has there been a breach of Article 6 of the Convention and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention arising from the non-enforcement of domestic decisions in the applicants' favour against the Sarajevo Canton (see Spahic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 20514/15 and 15 others, 14 November 2017; Kunic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos.
• EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 8181/21

  TB INZINJERING D.O.O. v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  20514/15 and 15 others, §§ 25-31, 14 November 2017 and Kunic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos.