Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÜL v. TURKEY
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Violation of Art. 2 in respect of death of applicant's son Violation of Art. 2 in respect of failure to carry out effective investigation Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - ...
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 03.04.1995 - 22676/93
- EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
Wird zitiert von ... (85) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see the McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
The applicant's complaints in this regard are therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see the Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52, and the Kaya and Yasa judgments cited above, § 107 and p. 2442, § 113 respectively). - EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2000 - 22676/93
As regards the applicant's claims for loss of earnings, the Court's case-law establishes that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in the appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, amongst other authorities, the Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 13 June 1994 (Article 50), Series A no. 285-C, pp.
- EGMR, 07.07.2011 - 55721/07
Britische Soldaten sollen Kriegsverbrechen begangen haben
Tout manque d'indépendance ayant pu résulter de la clôture de l'investigation initiale aurait été corrigé par l'enquête ultérieure et l'intervention de l'Autorité de poursuite de l'armée et de l'Attorney General (Gül c. Turquie, no 22676/93, §§ 92-95, 14 décembre 2000 ; voir également McCann et autres c. Royaume-Uni, 27 septembre 1995, §§ 157 et 162-164, série A no 324). - EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
The remedy required by Article 13 must be "effective" in practice as well as in law, in particular in the sense that its exercise must not be unjustifiably hindered by the acts or omissions of the authorities of the respondent State (see Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-II; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 100, 14 December 2000; Ä°lhan, cited above; and McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 107, ECHR 2001-III). - EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 2668/07
DINK c. TURQUIE
Les autorités doivent avoir pris les mesures qui leur étaient raisonnablement accessibles pour que fussent recueillies les preuves concernant la série des incidents (voir, par exemple, Salman c. Turquie [GC], no 21986/93, § 106, CEDH 2000-VII, Tanrıkulu c. Turquie [GC], no 23763/94, § 109, CEDH 1999-IV, et Gül c. Turquie, no 22676/93, § 89, 14 décembre 2000).
- EGMR, 24.03.2011 - 23458/02
Tod eines Demonstranten beim G-8-Gipfel in Genua
The authorities must take whatever reasonable steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of the clinical findings, including the cause of death (as regards autopsies, see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 106, ECHR 2000-VII; on the subject of witnesses, see, for example, Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; as regards forensic examinations, see, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000). - EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08
ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI
The authorities must take whatever reasonable steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of the clinical findings, including the cause of death (as regards autopsies, see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 106, ECHR 2000-VII; on the subject of witnesses, see, for example, Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; as regards forensic examinations, see, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000). - EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 74010/11
DEMBELE c. SUISSE
Les autorités doivent prendre toutes les mesures raisonnables à leur disposition pour obtenir les preuves relatives à l'incident en question, y compris, entre autres, les dépositions des témoins oculaires et les expertises criminalistiques (El Masri, précité § 183 ; Tanrıkulu c. Turquie [GC], no 23763/94, § 104, CEDH 1999-IV, et Gül c. Turquie, no 22676/93, § 89, 14 décembre 2000).En vertu de la jurisprudence de la Cour, « (...) les autorités doivent prendre toutes les mesures raisonnables à leur disposition (...)'(El-Masri [GC], précité, § 183, Tanrıkulu c. Turquie [GC], no 23763/94, § 104, CEDH 1999 I, et Gül c. Turquie, no 22676/93, § 89, 14 décembre 2000).
- EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy providing a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, Salman, cited above, § 106; Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94
HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including inter alia eye witness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see concerning autopsies, e.g. Salman v. Turkey cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses e.g. Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999-IV, § 109; concerning forensic evidence e.g. Gül v. Turkey, 22676/93, [Section 4], § 89). - EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
The authorities must have taken the reasonable steps available to them to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, for example, concerning autopsies, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; concerning forensic evidence, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI
The authorities must take whatever reasonable steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, an autopsy which provides a complete and accurate record of injury and an objective analysis of clinical findings, including the cause of death (see, concerning autopsies, for example, Salman, cited above, § 106; concerning witnesses, for example, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 109, ECHR 1999-IV; and concerning forensic evidence, for example, Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000, unreported). - EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57947/00
ISSAIEVA, YOUSSOUPOVA ET BAZAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 34592/97
AGDAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 38588/21
X v. GREECE
- EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 30054/96
KELLY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.09.2004 - 50222/99
KRASTANOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 1049/17
NIKA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 16281/10
AYDAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57950/00
ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 17674/02
DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01
BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.06.2001 - 37453/97
AKMAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 29178/95
FINUCANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 76672/12
HOALGA ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 77658/11
LATIPOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 40485/08
PETROVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 16850/09
YELDEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 44587/98
ISAAK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 38501/02
AL FAYED c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97
ADALI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 28290/95
GÜNGÖR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.08.2009 - 23458/02
GIULIANI ET GAGGIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 36832/97
SOLOMOU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 60272/00
ESTAMIROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 53489/99
KAVAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 36088/97
ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 74832/01
MIZIGÁROVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 43290/98
McSHANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 23.03.2021 - 50636/11
KOTENOK c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 40549/11
POEDE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 22412/08
EMARS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 5269/08
SHCHIBORSHCH AND KUZMINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 23445/03
ESMUKHAMBETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 4762/05
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 45900/99
YASAROGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 37715/97
SHANAGHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 01.03.2018 - 49582/14
CHATZISTAVROU c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 10633/15
TADIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 03.11.2015 - 99/12
OLSZEWSCY v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 32277/07
DEKIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 32501/11
SULEYMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 1503/02
KHAMZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 17170/04
KERIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 12219/05
IORGA v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 45388/99
KALLIS AND ANDROULLA PANAYI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.02.2008 - 57084/00
USTA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 74239/01
MUSAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 40073/98
IHSAN BILGIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 41964/98
CENNET AYHAN AND MEHMET SALIH AYHAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.07.2004 - 35875/97
SIRIN YILMAZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.05.2016 - 32163/13
GHEORGHITA ET ALEXE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 32036/13
TRESKAVICA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 29.01.2015 - 5096/12
NIKOLIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 15397/11
ALBERTI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 52744/07
DIMOVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 17380/09
PAPAPETROU ET AUTRES c. GRECE
- EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06
TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 20106/06
JULARIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 14.11.2008 - 21586/02
AKHMADOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 46747/99
AKDOGDU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.10.2019 - 50283/13
FOUNTAS v. GREECE
- EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 50553/07
DUBOIS ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 21539/02
TRAPEZNIKOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 40074/98
FEYZI YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 57049/00
YÜKSEL ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 45626/99
HAVVA DUDU ESEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 46252/99
ATAMAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 2527/09
KOSUMOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 31682/07
KHAMZATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2010 - 9191/06
SULEYMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 75535/01
ESAT BAYRAM v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 36217/97
MENTESE AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 46260/99
EVCIL v. TURKEY