Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,60365) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANGUELOV v. BULGARIA
Art. 11, Art. 6, Art. 8 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
- EGMR, 13.04.2006 - 45963/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
Moreover, Article 6 of the Convention does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 18.05.1999 - 28972/95
NINN-HANSEN c. DANEMARK
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
This is so with regard to the impartiality of the Court under Article 6 § 1 as well as with regard to the presumption of innocence embodied in Article 6 § 2 (see Ninn-Hansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 28972/95, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 21.02.2002 - 42409/98
SCHÜSSEL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
It recalls at the outset that the concept of private life extends to aspects relating to personal identity, such as a person's picture (see Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002, and Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, §§ 50, 52 and 53, ECHR 2004-VI).
- EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 46115/99
BENEDEK v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
In other, less serious cases civil-law remedies may be sufficient (see Benedek v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 46115/99, 8 October 2002). - EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98
M.C. c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
Article 8 does not require a criminal-law remedy against infringements of the rights set out therein in every case, but only in certain limited circumstances, such as rape or other grave encroachments on the physical integrity of the person, where fundamental values and essential aspects of private life are at stake (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII). - EKMR, 08.07.1978 - 7572/76
ENSSLIN, BAADER and RASPE v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
However, it does not seem that the newspapers' interest in the applicant's trial amounted to a virulent press campaign aimed at hampering the fairness of the trial (see Ensslin, Baader and Raspe v. the Federal Republic of Germany, nos. 7572/76, 7586/76 and 7587/76, Commission decision of 8 July 1978, DR 14, p. 64, at pp. 112-13). - EKMR, 15.10.1980 - 8403/78
JESPERS v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 45963/99
Finally, as regards the applicant's allegation that the proceedings were unfair on account of the fact that the press ran articles about them in the morning of 8 November 2000, the Court accepts that, in certain cases, a virulent press campaign can adversely affect the fairness of the trial and involve the State's responsibility (see Jespers v. Belgium, no. 8403/78, Commission decision of 15 October 1980, Decisions and Reports (DR) 22, p. 100).