Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,64072
EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09 (https://dejure.org/2010,64072)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.12.2010 - 67545/09 (https://dejure.org/2010,64072)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. Dezember 2010 - 67545/09 (https://dejure.org/2010,64072)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64072) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

    Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    The next matter to be decided is whether the contested legislation constitutes an interference with the exercise of the rights guaranteed to the applicants under Article 8 § 1. "Private life" is a broad term encompassing, inter alia, aspects of an individual's physical and social identity including the right to personal autonomy, personal development and to establish and develop relationships with other human beings and the outside world (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 62, ECHR 2002-III), and it incorporates the right to respect for both the decisions to become and not to become a parent (Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 71, ECHR 2007-IV).
  • EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71

    Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    At this point I would like to underline the need for a clear distinguishing of the present case from the one of Klass and Others v. Germany (6 September 1978, Series A no. 28).
  • EGMR, 20.03.2007 - 5410/03

    TYSIAC c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    Private life includes a person's physical and psychological integrity, and the State is under a positive obligation to secure its citizens their right to effective respect for this integrity (Tysiac v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 107, ECHR 2007-IV).
  • EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 46306/99

    OCIC contre la CROATIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    Therefore, I find the rule in Ocic v. Croatia ((dec.), no. 46306/99, ECHR 1999-VIII), applicable to the present case.
  • EGMR, 29.10.1992 - 14234/88

    OPEN DOOR AND DUBLIN WELL WOMAN v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    In these circumstances, the Court is satisfied that the applicant can claim to be a victim of a violation of her rights under Article 8 of the Convention without any particular measure being applied, simply by virtue of the existence of the impugned legislation (see Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland, 29 October 1992, § 44, Series A no. 246-A).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91

    KROON AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    Its positive obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to ensure respect for private life (see Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 31, Series A no. 297-C; and Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 57, ECHR 2002-I).
  • EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99

    MIKULIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    Its positive obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to ensure respect for private life (see Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 31, Series A no. 297-C; and Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 57, ECHR 2002-I).
  • EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 27527/03

    L. v. LITHUANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 67545/09
    In this respect, I maintain my position expressed in the dissenting opinion in the case of L. v. Lithuania: a lack of secondary legislation does not impede the realisation of a right provided for by the primary legislation, as long as the latter remains permissive (see L. v. Lithuania, no. 27527/03, ECHR 2007-X).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht