Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  E.B. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BODRUG v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 1122/12

  P.T. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  This is all the more true when the processing affects highly intimate and sensitive categories of information, notably information relating to the physical or mental health of an identifiable individual (see, in particular, Z. v. Finland, 25 February 1997, § 95, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I; Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016, Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788/06, § 70, 26 January 2017 and P.T. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 1122/12, § 26, 26 May 2020).

  While the conclusion in the preceding paragraph is sufficient for the Court to find a violation of Article 8 of the Convention, it cannot but mention that the Government did not make any submissions as to which "legitimate aim" could have been pursued by disclosing the applicant's medical information to the public (see P.T. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 1122/12, § 29, 26 May 2020), nor as to why such a disclosure was "necessary in a democratic society".

• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 62257/15

  MIFSUD v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  Where the applicant has died after the application was lodged, the Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014 and Mifsud v. Malta, no. 62257/15, § 39, 29 January 2019).
• EGMR, 01.07.2021 - 7796/16

  HÁJOVSKÝ v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  The fact that information is already in the public domain does not necessarily remove the protection of Article 8 of the Convention, especially if the person concerned neither revealed the information nor consented to its disclosure (Hájovský v. Slovakia, no. 7796/16, § 48, 1 July 2021).

 
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  Where the applicant has died after the application was lodged, the Court has accepted that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 97, ECHR 2014 and Mifsud v. Malta, no. 62257/15, § 39, 29 January 2019).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 67, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 40378/06

  Y.Y. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  This is all the more true when the processing affects highly intimate and sensitive categories of information, notably information relating to the physical or mental health of an identifiable individual (see, in particular, Z. v. Finland, 25 February 1997, § 95, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I; Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016, Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788/06, § 70, 26 January 2017 and P.T. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 1122/12, § 26, 26 May 2020).
• EGMR, 26.01.2017 - 42788/06

  SURIKOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  This is all the more true when the processing affects highly intimate and sensitive categories of information, notably information relating to the physical or mental health of an identifiable individual (see, in particular, Z. v. Finland, 25 February 1997, § 95, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I; Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016, Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788/06, § 70, 26 January 2017 and P.T. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 1122/12, § 26, 26 May 2020).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 67, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 36908/13

  N.S. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 41542/13

  Thus, notwithstanding that the information in question was already known to the public, a further dissemination of such "public information" had still to be weighed against the applicant's right to privacy (N.S. v. Croatia, no. 36908/13, § 100, 10 September 2020 and Hájovský, cited above, § 48).