Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 43779/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,33288) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MACZYNSKI v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.06.2001 - 43779/98
- EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 43779/98
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85
Obermeier ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 43779/98
The Court does not deem it necessary to consider the question in such detail (see, among other authorities, the Obermeier v. Austria judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, pp. 23-24, § 72; the Ferraro v. Italy judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 197, pp. 9-10, § 17).The Court does not deem it necessary to consider the question in such detail (see, among other authorities, the Obermeier v. Austria judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, pp. 23-24, § 72; the Ferraro v. Italy judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 197, pp. 9-10, § 17)" (see paragraph 33 of the judgment)[1].
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 43779/98
Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to him under that head (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 164, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 19753/92
CIRICOSTA AND VIOLA v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 43779/98
Thus, in the case of Ciricosta and Viola v. Italy (judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 337-A), in which the period in issue was more than 15 years for civil proceedings that were still pending at the time of the judgment, the Court held:.
- EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 40436/16
MARMYLOVA v. UKRAINE
However, certain cases may call for an overall assessment in this respect, without a separate examination of each of those criteria (see, for example, Maczy?„ski v. Poland, no. 43779/98, § 33, 15 January 2002, and Khlebik v. Ukraine, no. 2945/16, § 69, 25 July 2017). - EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 30256/15
FASOLKO AND MATYCH v. UKRAINE
However, certain cases may call for a global assessment in this respect without separate examination of each of those criteria (see, for example, Maczynski v. Poland, no. 43779/98, § 33, 15 January 2002).