Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 44165/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,44895) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SKROBOL v. POLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 44165/98
- EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 44165/98
- EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 44165/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 44165/98
The Court recalls, at the outset, that while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair trial, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is therefore primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95
BARANOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 44165/98
The Court first recalls that any measure depriving a person of his liberty should issue from and be executed by an appropriate authority and should not be arbitrary (see, among other authorities, Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-57, ECHR 2000-III; and the Winterwerp v. the Netherlands judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. - EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73
WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2002 - 44165/98
The Court first recalls that any measure depriving a person of his liberty should issue from and be executed by an appropriate authority and should not be arbitrary (see, among other authorities, Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-57, ECHR 2000-III; and the Winterwerp v. the Netherlands judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp.