Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,37525
EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04 (https://dejure.org/2009,37525)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.01.2009 - 33509/04 (https://dejure.org/2009,37525)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Januar 2009 - 33509/04 (https://dejure.org/2009,37525)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,37525) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BOURDOV c. RUSSIE (N° 2)

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
    Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'art. 6 Violation de P1-1 Non-violation de l'art. 6 Non-violation de P1-1 Violation de l'art. 13 Etat défendeur tenu de prendre des mesures individuelles Etat défendeur tenu de prendre des mesures générales Préjudice moral ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 Violation of P1-1 No violation of Art. 6 No violation of P1-1 Violation of Art. 13 Respondent State to take individual measures Respondent State to take measures of a general character Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

  • Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte PDF

    (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (120)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

    S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002 VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008...).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    It therefore requires that the States provide a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

    Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002 VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008...).
     
  • EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99

    E.G. c. POLOGNE ET 175 AUTRES AFFAIRES DE LA RIVIÈRE BOUG

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    Indeed, the Court's task, as defined by Article 19, that is to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto", is not necessarily best achieved by repeating the same findings in large series of cases (see, mutatis mutandis, E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 27, 23 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

    SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002 VI; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008...).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    It is for the Contracting States to organise their legal systems in such a way that the competent authorities can meet their obligation in this regard (see mutatis mutandis Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 24, ECHR 2000-IV, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 45, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 63995/00

    KUKALO v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    Nor is it open to a State authority to cite the lack of funds or other resources (such as housing) as an excuse for not honouring a judgment debt (see Burdov, cited above, § 35, and Kukalo v. Russia, no. 63995/00, § 49, 3 November 2005).
  • EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

    RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    The reasonableness of such delay is to be determined having regard in particular to the complexity of the enforcement proceedings, the applicant's own behaviour and that of the competent authorities, and the amount and nature of the court award (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99

    WOLKENBERG AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    The object of the pilot-judgment procedure is to facilitate the speediest and most effective resolution of a dysfunction affecting the protection of the Convention rights in question in the national legal order (see Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

    BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04
    In view of the foregoing, the Court concludes that the present situation must be qualified as a practice incompatible with the Convention (see Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V).
  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 36494/02

    PETRUSHKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

    DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA

    The Court found that, while the possibility of obtaining compensation was not ruled out, the remedy did not offer reasonable prospects of success, in particular because the award was conditional on the establishment of fault on the part of the authorities (see, for instance, Roman Karasev v. Russia, no. 30251/03, §§ 81-85, 25 November 2010; Shilbergs v. Russia, no. 20075/03, §§ 71-79, 17 December 2009; Kokoshkina v. Russia, no. 2052/08, § 52, 28 May 2009; Aleksandr Makarov, cited above, §§ 77 and 87-89; Benediktov v. Russia, no. 106/02, §§ 29 and 30, 10 May 2007; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, §§ 109-116, ECHR 2009; and, most recently, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 30767/05

    MARIA ATANASIU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    La Cour note qu'à la différence des affaires Broniowski et Hutten-Czapska, précitées, dans lesquelles la défaillance dans l'ordre juridique interne a été identifiée pour la première fois, la Cour se prononce dans les présentes affaires après plusieurs arrêts qui ont déjà conclu à la violation des articles 6 § 1 de la Convention et 1 du Protocole no 1 en raison des défaillances du système roumain d'indemnisation ou de restitution (voir, dans le même sens, Bourdov c. Russie (no 2), no 33509/04, §§ 129, CEDH 2009-..., Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov c. Ukraine, no 40450/04, § 83, CEDH 2009-... (extraits)).
  • Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 30.04.2019 - C-556/17

    Torubarov - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und …

    Vgl. auch EGMR, Urteil vom 15. Januar 2009, Burdov/Russland (Nr. 2) (CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD003350904, § 68).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht