Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PERUSKO v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 36998/09
• EGMR, 22.10.2014 - 36998/09
• EGMR - 36998/09 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 36998/09

  Where the individual's access is limited either by operation of law or in fact, the Court will examine whether the limitation imposed impaired the essence of the right and, in particular, whether it pursued a legitimate aim and whether there was a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93; Zwiazek Nauczycielstwa Polskiego v. Poland, no. 42049/98, § 29, ECHR 2004-IX; and Szwagrun-Baurycza v. Poland, no. 41187/02, § 49, 24 October 2006).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 36998/09

  And in civil matters one can scarcely conceive of the rule of law without there being a possibility of having access to the courts (see, among many other authorities, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 34 in fine and 35-36, Series A no. 18; Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 91-93, ECHR 2001-V; and Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95,, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 36998/09

  It may be subject to legitimate restrictions such as statutory limitation periods, security - for - costs orders, and regulations concerning minors and persons of unsound mind (see Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, §§ 51-52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, §§ 62-67, Series A no. 316-B; and Golder, cited above, § 39).

 
• EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95

  KREUZ c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 36998/09

  And in civil matters one can scarcely conceive of the rule of law without there being a possibility of having access to the courts (see, among many other authorities, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 34 in fine and 35-36, Series A no. 18; Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 91-93, ECHR 2001-V; and Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95,, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99

  KUTIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 36998/09

  In this way it embodies the "right to a court", which, according to the Court's case-law, includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain the "determination" of the dispute by a court (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II, and Menshakova v. Ukraine, no. 377/02, § 52, 8 April 2010).
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 377/02

  MENSHAKOVA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 36998/09

  In this way it embodies the "right to a court", which, according to the Court's case-law, includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain the "determination" of the dispute by a court (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II, and Menshakova v. Ukraine, no. 377/02, § 52, 8 April 2010).