Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 51297/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,31018) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SENTÜRK v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 19.06.2003 - 28490/95
HULKI GÜNES v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 51297/08
The Court further notes that in convicting the applicant, the trial court did not solely rely on the complainant's statement dated 24 January 2002, but took into account the statement of the other co-accused, who confirmed that the applicant had brought the complainant to his parents" house in Istanbul (see, a contrario, Hulki Günes v. Turkey, no. 28490/95, § 94-96, ECHR 2003-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 15.12.2011 - 26766/05
Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Zeugen (Recht auf ein faires Verfahren: …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 51297/08
Exceptions to this principle are possible but must not infringe the rights of the defence, which, as a rule, require that the accused should be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when that witness makes his statement or at a later stage of proceedings (see, Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 51297/08
The Court's task is not to examine whether the applicant was guilty or innocent of the offences of which he was convicted, but to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way which the evidence was taken, were fair (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 46, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999 I). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 51297/08
The Court's task is not to examine whether the applicant was guilty or innocent of the offences of which he was convicted, but to ascertain whether the proceedings as a whole, including the way which the evidence was taken, were fair (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 46, and García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999 I).