Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHKARUPA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Shkarupa v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05

  The Court further points out that it had to decide whether the applicant had lost the status of "victim" under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in the case of Labita v. Italy ([GC], no. 26772/95, § 143, ECHR 2000-IV).

  The present case differs from the case of Labita (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV), which was cited by the Chamber to substantiate its reasoning.

• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05

  The Court has already, on numerous occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many other authorities, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X and Dirdizov, cited above, §§ 108-11; see also Zherebin v. Russia, no. 51445/09, communicated on 13 November 2012).
• EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

  BLECIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05

  The Court reiterates that it has to ascertain that the application has been lodged in compliance with the six-month rule even where the Government have not made a preliminary objection to that effect (see Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 68, ECHR 2006-III).
• EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 26746/05

  SHISHKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05

  The Court considers that his detention in the Berdsk IVS should therefore be regarded as a "continuing situation" (see Shishkov v. Russia, no. 26746/05, § 87, 20 February 2014, and Ananyev and Others, cited above, § 78).
• EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 51445/09

  ZHEREBIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 36461/05

  The Court has already, on numerous occasions, examined applications against Russia raising similar complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in respect of the Russian courts" failure to provide sufficient and relevant grounds for applicants" detention (see, among many other authorities, Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005-X and Dirdizov, cited above, §§ 108-11; see also Zherebin v. Russia, no. 51445/09, communicated on 13 November 2012).

• EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 56220/15

  AMIROV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has already noted the inappropriateness of conditions of detention which did not allow the possibility of using the toilet in private (see Mursic v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, § 106, ECHR 2016; Shkarupa v. Russia, no. 36461/05, §§ 55-56, 15 January 2015; Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149 and 157, 10 January 2012; and Mandic and Jovic v. Slovenia, nos. 5774/10 and 5985/10, § 76, 20 October 2011).