Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 34070/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,56017
EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 34070/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,56017)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.02.2007 - 34070/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,56017)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Februar 2007 - 34070/03 (https://dejure.org/2007,56017)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,56017) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

    RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 34070/03
    As to the applicant's argument that he had exhausted the domestic remedies at the time of lodging his application, the Court recalls that it examines the question of exhaustion of domestic remedies based on the facts existing as of the time it is called upon to decide on the admissibility of the complaint, and not as of the time of lodging of the application (see, for example, Yolcu v. Turkey (dec.), no. 34684/97, 3 May 2001, and Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 38, § 91).
  • EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

    CARDOT c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 34070/03
    Article 35 of the Convention normally requires also that the complaints intended to be made subsequently at Strasbourg should have been made to those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see Cardot v. France, judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 4439/04

    ISMAYILOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    The Court reiterates that the issue whether domestic remedies have been exhausted is normally determined by reference to the date when the application was lodged with the Court (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V (extracts)) although, depending on the circumstances of the case, the Court may accept that the last stage of available remedies may be reached after the lodging of the application but before the Court is called upon to pronounce itself on admissibility (see, for example, Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 38, § 91; Ramazanova and Others, cited above, § 42; and Ivanov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 34070/03, 15 February 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht