Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98, 45437/99, 48380/99, 48014/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, 194/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,60267
EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98, 45437/99, 48380/99, 48014/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, 194/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,60267)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.03.2007 - 43278/98, 45437/99, 48380/99, 48014/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, 194/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,60267)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. März 2007 - 43278/98, 45437/99, 48380/99, 48014/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, 194/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,60267)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,60267) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    No violation of P1-1 for some applicants Violation of P1-1 for the others No violation of Art. 6 (one applicant) Not necessary to examine Arts.13 and 14 Just satisfaction partially reserved Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (25)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94

    CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    In determining whether this requirement is met, the Court recognises that the State enjoys a wide margin of appreciation with regard both to choosing the means of enforcement and to ascertaining whether the consequences of enforcement are justified in the general interest for the purpose of achieving the object of the law in question (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 75, ECHR 1999-III).
  • EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

    Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    The fact that the Supreme Administrative Court later adopted the view that there was no "right" to purchase a municipal apartment under section 5 § 2 of the Compensation Law did not remove, retrospectively, the arguability of the applicant's claim at the time it was submitted for adjudication (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 89, ECHR 2001-V and Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 58, 10 August 2006).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99

    KUTIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    The right of access to a court includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3166, § 136, and p. 3169, § 147; and Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II).
     
  • EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 36548/97

    PINCOVÁ ET PINC c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    In the Government's view, the present case was different from Pincová and Pinc v. the Czech Republic (no. 36548/97, § 51, ECHR 2002-VIII) where in somewhat similar circumstances the Court had found that the proportionality requirement had not been complied with.
  • EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 40476/98

    YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    The fact that the Supreme Administrative Court later adopted the view that there was no "right" to purchase a municipal apartment under section 5 § 2 of the Compensation Law did not remove, retrospectively, the arguability of the applicant's claim at the time it was submitted for adjudication (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 89, ECHR 2001-V and Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 58, 10 August 2006).
  • EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

    PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    In particular, there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised by any measure depriving a person of his possessions (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 23, § 38).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

    Obermeier ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    This does not mean, however, that the applicants were denied access to a court, provided that the dispute which they submitted for adjudication was the subject of a genuine examination (see, mutatis mutandis, Obermeier v. Austria, judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, p. 21, § 68).
  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
    The right of access to a court includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3166, § 136, and p. 3169, § 147; and Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht