Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 15754/06, 22107/07, 22476/07, 49770/07, 42297/08, 59141/08, 60802/08, 27551/09, 40789/09, 56311/09, 59538/09, 44683/10, 45648/10, 61305/10, 65850/10, 11057/11, 20662/11, 31041/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 15754/06, 22107/07, 22476/07, 49770/07, 42297/08, 59141/08, 60802/08, 27551/09, 40789/09, 56311/09, 59538/09, 44683/10, 45648/10, 61305/10, 65850/10, 11057/11, 20662/11, 31041/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,22253)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.04.2014 - 15754/06, 22107/07, 22476/07, 49770/07, 42297/08, 59141/08, 60802/08, 27551/09, 40789/09, 56311/09, 59538/09, 44683/10, 45648/10, 61305/10, 65850/10, 11057/11, 20662/11, 31041/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,22253)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. April 2014 - 15754/06, 22107/07, 22476/07, 49770/07, 42297/08, 59141/08, 60802/08, 27551/09, 40789/09, 56311/09, 59538/09, 44683/10, 45648/10, 61305/10, 65850/10, 11057/11, 20662/11, 31041/11 (https://dejure.org/2014,22253)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,22253) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 15754/06
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declarations in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 15754/06
Even if the method of calculation employed by the Russian authorities in respect of the conditions-of-detention complaints did not correspond exactly to the guidelines established by the Court in the pilot judgment (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 172, 10 January 2012), what is important is that the proposed sums are not unreasonable in comparison with the awards made by the Court in similar cases (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 105, ECHR 2006-V).