Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FROMMELT contre LIECHTENSTEIN [Extraits]

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  Partiellement recevable Partiellement irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FROMMELT v. LIECHTENSTEIN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99
• EGMR, 24.06.2004 - 49158/99

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  The assessment of that minimum is relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment and its physical or mental effects (see, for instance, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 162; Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 44, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94

  WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  According to the Court's case-law, the Convention does not exclude the transfer of competences to international organisations - or under international agreements -, but the Contracting State's responsibility for "securing" the Convention rights continues even after such a transfer (see, for instance, Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 32, ECHR 1999-I and, mutatis mutandis, Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83

  HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  It also requires, however, that any deprivation of liberty should be consistent with the purpose of Article 5, namely to protect individuals from arbitrariness (see, for instance, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 17 and 19, §§ 39 and 45; Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, p. 21, § 63; and, as a recent authority, Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, § 46, to be published in ECHR 2003).

 
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 50272/99

  HUTCHISON REID v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  It also requires, however, that any deprivation of liberty should be consistent with the purpose of Article 5, namely to protect individuals from arbitrariness (see, for instance, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 17 and 19, §§ 39 and 45; Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, p. 21, § 63; and, as a recent authority, Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, § 46, to be published in ECHR 2003).
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 50901/99

  VAN DER VEN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  The applicant has not substantiated his complaint and has not adduced any argument to show that the interference with his family life went beyond the inevitable limitations inherent in any lawful detention (see for instance, Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, § 68, to be published in ECHR 2003).
• EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

  WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  It also requires, however, that any deprivation of liberty should be consistent with the purpose of Article 5, namely to protect individuals from arbitrariness (see, for instance, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 17 and 19, §§ 39 and 45; Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, p. 21, § 63; and, as a recent authority, Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, § 46, to be published in ECHR 2003).
• EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 33354/96

  Recht auf Konfrontation und Befragung von Mitangeklagten als Zeugen im Sinne der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  As the requirements of Article 6 § 3 of the Convention are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, the Court will examine the complaints under those two provisions taken together (see amongst many other authorities, Luca v. Italy, no. 33354/96, § 37, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 05.11.1981 - 7215/75

  X v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2003 - 49158/99

  His detention served to ensure that he would appear before the Vaduz Regional Court and therefore comes under paragraph 1 (c) of Article 5. However, in view of the fact that this detention was also based on a finding of a state of unsound mind, it must in addition be considered under Article 5 § 1 (e) (see, mutatis mutandis, X. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 5 November 1981, Series A no. 46, p. 17, § 39).