Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 59519/00, 8932/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2006,46011
EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 59519/00, 8932/05 (https://dejure.org/2006,46011)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.06.2006 - 59519/00, 8932/05 (https://dejure.org/2006,46011)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Juni 2006 - 59519/00, 8932/05 (https://dejure.org/2006,46011)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,46011) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

    AIREY v. IRELAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 59519/00
    They relied on the Court's judgment in the case Airey v. Ireland (Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32).

    Article 6 § 1 may sometimes compel the State to provide for the assistance of a lawyer when such assistance proves indispensable for an effective access to court either because legal representation is rendered compulsory, as is done by the domestic law of certain Contracting States for various types of litigation, or by reason of the complexity of the procedure or of the case (Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, § 26).

  • EGMR, 13.05.1980 - 6694/74

    ARTICO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 59519/00
    The Government refer to the Court's case law in similar cases (Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, § 18; Daud v. Portugal, judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, § 33).
  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 59519/00
    In this context, the means by which a State ensure effective access to civil courts fall within its margin of appreciation (Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, §§ 26-36).
  • EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 46800/99

    DEL SOL c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 59519/00
    The applicants accept that there is no obligation under the Convention to make legal aid available for disputes (contestations) in civil proceedings, as there is a clear distinction between the wording of Article 6 § 3 (c), which guarantees the right to free legal assistance on certain conditions in criminal proceedings, and of Article 6 § 1, which makes no reference to legal assistance (Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 20, ECHR 2002-II).
  • EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 68978/01

    BATOR v. POLAND

    The relevant provisions concerning the appointment of a legal-aid lawyer and the formal requirements for lodging a cassation appeal are set out in the Court's judgments in the cases of Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, § 16-23, 27 June 2006; Staroszczyk v. Poland, no. 59519/00, § 38-72, 22 March 2007 and Sialkowska v. Poland, no. 8932/05, § 20-55, 22 March 2007.

    The Court has established in a number of cases its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right of access to the Supreme Court in civil proceedings on account of legal-aid lawyers" refusals to prepare cassation appeals (Sialkowska v. Poland, no. 8932/05, 22 March 2007; Staroszczyk v. Poland, no. 59519/00, 22 March 2007), as well as concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005 and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht