Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 30523/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62842) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ADAMCZUK v. POLAND
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 30523/07
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 30523/07
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 30523/07
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 30523/07
However, the "effectiveness" of a "remedy" within the meaning of that provision does not depend on the certainty of a favourable outcome for the applicant (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 154 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI, §§ 156-157). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 30523/07
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII; and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V. - EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
MAJEWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 30523/07
As to the Government's argument that the applicant cannot be considered a "victim", within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, of a deprivation of his right to a hearing within a reasonable time, this issue falls to be determined in the light of the principles recently established in the Court's case-law (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-107, ECHR 2006-...; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-213, ECHR 2006 -...; and Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 36, 11 October 2005).
- EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 57290/08
DOMINGUES LOUREIRO ET AUTRES c. PORTUGAL
Il appartient dès lors à la Cour de vérifier en l'espèce, d'une part, s'il y a eu reconnaissance par les autorités nationales, au moins en substance, d'une violation d'un droit protégé par la Convention et, d'autre part, si le redressement peut être considéré comme approprié et suffisant (Scordino c. Italie (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, § 193, CEDH 2006, Delle Cave et Corrado c. Italie, no 14626/03, 5 juin 2007, § 25-31, CEDH 2007-VI, Garino c. Italie (déc.), nos 16605/03, 16641/03, 16644/03, CEDH, 18 mai 2010, Adamczuk c. Poland (révision), no 30523/07, § 62, 15 juin 2010, Boniface c. France (déc.), no 28785/09, CEDH, 25 mai 2010, et, a contrario, Aragosa c. Italie, no 20191/03, § 23, 18 décembre 2007).