Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,62308
EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,62308)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.06.2010 - 34334/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,62308)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Juni 2010 - 34334/04 (https://dejure.org/2010,62308)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62308) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. ARMENIA

    Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) No violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-2 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (20)

  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    The Court points out that on numerous occasions it has accepted that the parents, spouse or children of a deceased applicant are entitled to take his place in the proceedings, if they express their wish to do so (see, for example, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, §§ 37-38, Series A no. 35; X v. the United Kingdom, 5 November 1981, § 32, Series A no. 46; Vocaturo v. Italy, 24 May 1991, § 2, Series A no. 206-C; G. v. Italy, 27 February 1992, § 2, Series A no. 228-F; Pandolfelli and Palumbo v. Italy, 27 February 1992, § 2, Series A no. 231-B; X v. France, 31 March 1992, § 26, Series A no. 234-C; Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A; and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, §§ 38-39, ECHR 1999-VI).

    The Court reiterates that the principles of equality of arms and of the presumption of innocence are specific elements of the wider concept of a fair trial in criminal proceedings (see Ekbatani v. Sweden, 26 May 1988, § 30, Series A no. 134, and Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 56, Series A no. 35).

  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    The Court has also emphasised the right of all prisoners to conditions of detention which are compatible with respect for their human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject them to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, their health and well-being are adequately secured by, among other things, providing the requisite medical assistance (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).

    It further observes that treatment has been held by the Court to be "degrading" because it was such as to arouse in its victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 92, ECHR 2000-XI).

  • EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 59696/00

    KHUDOBIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    The medical assistance was provided to him on the initiative of the medical staff and did not depend on the discretion of the investigating authority, unlike the case of Khudobin v. Russia (no. 59696/00, § 86, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).

    Although this Article cannot be construed as laying down a general obligation to release detainees on health grounds, it nonetheless imposes an obligation on the State to protect the physical well-being of persons deprived of their liberty by, among other things, providing them with the requisite medical assistance (see Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456/05, § 77, 4 October 2005, and Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 93, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts)).

  • EGMR, 27.11.2003 - 65436/01

    HENAF c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    Thus, application of measures of restraint to an applicant in a private setting still gave rise to a violation of Article 3 in a situation where no serious risks to security could be proved to exist (see Henaf v. France, no. 65436/01, §§ 51 and 56, ECHR 2003-XI).
  • EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 52058/99

    GORODNITCHEV c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    Furthermore, a violation of Article 3 was found in a case where the applicant, who was not a public figure, was unjustifiably handcuffed during public hearings (see Gorodnichev v. Russia, no. 52058/99, §§ 105-109, 24 May 2007).
  • EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 1704/06

    RAMISHVILI AND KOKHREIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    Thus, a violation of Article 3 was found in a case where the applicants, publicly known figures, were placed during a hearing on their detention, which was broadcast live throughout the country, in a barred dock resembling a metal cage and were guarded by special forces wearing black hood-like masks, despite the fact that there was no risk that the applicants might abscond or resort to violence during their transfer to the courthouse or at the hearings (see Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, no. 1704/06, §§ 98-102, 27 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 06.05.1985 - 8658/79

    Bönisch ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    Its essential aim, as indicated by the words "under the same conditions", is a full "equality of arms" in the matter (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 91, Series A no. 22; Bönisch v. Austria, 6 May 1985, § 32, Series A no. 92; and Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

    DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    The former principle implies that each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case - including his evidence - under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 33, Series A no. 274), while the latter principle will be violated if a judicial decision concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law.
  • EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

    Minelli ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court regards the accused as guilty (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, §§ 27 and 37, Series A no. 62).
  • EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 34334/04
    However, even in the absence of publicity, a given treatment may still be degrading if the victim could be humiliated in his or her own eyes, even if not in the eyes of others (see Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no. 26; and Ramishvili and Kokhreidze, cited above, §§ 97 and 100).
  • EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

    VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  • EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 28114/95

    DALBAN v. ROMANIA

  • EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

    Mord an James Bulger

  • EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

    Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen,

  • EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

    PEERS v. GREECE

  • EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 3456/05

    SARBAN v. MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des

  • EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

    RAIMONDO v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 31.03.1992 - 18020/91

    X c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 05.11.1981 - 7215/75

    X v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 32133/11

    KUMMER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    Application of measures of restraint to an applicant in a non-public setting may still give rise to a violation of Article 3 in a situation where no serious risks to security could be proved to exist (see Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334/04, § 125, 15 June 2010, referring to Hénaf v. France, cited above, §§ 51 and 56).
  • EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 446/10

    PUGZLYS v. POLAND

    11082/06 and 13772/05, §§ 485-486, 25 July 2013, Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334/04, §§ 126-29, 15 June 2010 and Piruzyan v. Armenia, no. 33376/07, § 74, 26 June 2012).
  • EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 18938/07

    RADKOV AND SABEV v. BULGARIA

    Being publicly visible may also be a relevant factor in assessing whether a form of treatment is "degrading" within the meaning of Article 3, but the Court does not consider that the absence of this public aspect will necessarily prevent a particular form of treatment from falling into that category; the application of measures of restraint to an applicant in a non-public setting may still give rise to a violation of Article 3 in a situation where no serious risks to security could be shown to exist (see Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334/04, § 125, 15 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 37509/05

    TOPAL c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

    Il soutient que la présente affaire est semblable à l'affaire Ashot Haroutyounian c. Arménie (no 34334/04, §§ 136-140, 15 juin 2010) dans laquelle la Cour a conclu à la non-violation de l'article 6 § 2 de la Convention.
  • EGMR, 15.09.2016 - 15602/07

    SIMON PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    It is true that in an Armenian case, where a metal cage in the courtroom was a permanent feature used as a dock for all criminal cases before an appeal court, the Court was satisfied that the holding of the applicant in such a cage, although constitutive of degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3, did not give rise to a violation of Article 6 as it did not place him at a disadvantage vis-à-vis the prosecution or suggest that the appeal court regarded him as guilty (Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334/04, 15 June 2010, §§ 138-139).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht