Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CENTRE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY v. \

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CENTRE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY v. \

  [MAC] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY LTD v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10, 32961/10
• EGMR, 04.07.2018 - 29545/10

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10

  And in civil matters one can scarcely conceive of the rule of law without there being a possibility of having access to the courts (see, among many other authorities, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 34 and 35-36, Series A no. 18; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 91-93 ECHR 2001-V; and Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10

  As regards the applicant company's claims in respect of non-pecuniary damage, the Court has not excluded the possibility that a company may be awarded pecuniary compensation for non-pecuniary damage (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2000-IV, and Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others, cited above, § 182).
• EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95

  KREUZ c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10

  And in civil matters one can scarcely conceive of the rule of law without there being a possibility of having access to the courts (see, among many other authorities, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 34 and 35-36, Series A no. 18; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 91-93 ECHR 2001-V; and Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI).

 
• EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99

  KUTIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10

  In this way it embodies the "right to a court", which, according to the Court's case-law, includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a "determination" of the dispute by a court (see, among other authorities, Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others, cited above, § 86; see also Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II and Menshakova v. Ukraine, no. 377/02, § 52, 8 April 2010).
• EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 377/02

  MENSHAKOVA v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10

  In this way it embodies the "right to a court", which, according to the Court's case-law, includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a "determination" of the dispute by a court (see, among other authorities, Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others, cited above, § 86; see also Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II and Menshakova v. Ukraine, no. 377/02, § 52, 8 April 2010).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 29545/10

  The right of access to court is not absolute and it may be subject to limitations (see Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 89, 29 November 2016; see also Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012; and Perusko v. Croatia, no. 36998/09, § 45, 15 January 2013).