Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 2006/13, 10857/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,16670) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EKSIOGLU AND MOSTUROGLU v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence) ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 74153/01
POPOV v. MOLDOVA (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 2006/13
The Court considers that these complaints fall to be examined under Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 only (see Sukhorubchenko v. Russia, no. 69315/01, § 60, 10 February 2005; mutatis mutandis, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 187, ECHR 2004-II; and Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 58, 18 January 2005), the relevant part of which reads as follows:. - EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 2006/13
The Court has acknowledged in its case-law the existence of two aspects to the protection afforded by the presumption of innocence: a procedural aspect relating to the conduct of the criminal trial, and a second aspect which aims to ensure respect for the applicant's established innocence in the context of subsequent proceedings where there is a link with criminal proceedings which have ended with a result other than a conviction (see, generally, Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424/09, §§ 93-94, ECHR 2013). - EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 2006/13
The Court considers that these complaints fall to be examined under Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 only (see Sukhorubchenko v. Russia, no. 69315/01, § 60, 10 February 2005; mutatis mutandis, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 187, ECHR 2004-II; and Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 58, 18 January 2005), the relevant part of which reads as follows:. - EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 2006/13
However, the Court has consistently held that disciplinary proceedings in which the right to continue to exercise a profession is at stake give rise to disputes ("contestations") over civil rights within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see, inter alia, König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, §§ 87-95, Series A no. 27, and Di Giovanni v. Italy, no. 51160/06, § 36, 9 July 2013). - EGMR, 10.02.2005 - 69315/01
SUKHORUBCHENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 2006/13
The Court considers that these complaints fall to be examined under Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 only (see Sukhorubchenko v. Russia, no. 69315/01, § 60, 10 February 2005; mutatis mutandis, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 187, ECHR 2004-II; and Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 58, 18 January 2005), the relevant part of which reads as follows:.