Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOTCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 2 - ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
TOTCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10
Transnistrien
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
Reports by inter-governmental and non-governmental organisations, the relevant domestic law and practice of the Republic of Moldova, and other pertinent documents were summarised in Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 61-77, 23 February 2016).As they did in Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 92-94, 23 February 2016), the Russian Government expressed the view that the approach to the issue of jurisdiction taken by the Court in the cases of Ila?Ÿcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII), Ivan?£oc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011), and Catan and Others (cited above) was wrong and at variance with public international law.
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 12336/03
PERISAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
It also requires the State to make regulations compelling institutions, whether private or public, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of people's lives (see, in the context of the use of force by State agents, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 151, Series A no. 324; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 58, 59 and 62, ECHR 2004-XI; Peri?Ÿan and Others v. Turkey, no. 12336/03, § 85, 20 May 2010; in the context of health care, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 130; Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, § 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Lopes de Sousa Fernandez, cited above, § 166; and Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, § 105; in the context of industrial activities, Öneryildiz, cited above, §§ 71 and 90; and Kolyadenko and Others, § 158). - EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02
BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
15339/02 and 4 others, § 129, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos.
- EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23687/05
IVANTOC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
As they did in Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 92-94, 23 February 2016), the Russian Government expressed the view that the approach to the issue of jurisdiction taken by the Court in the cases of Ila?Ÿcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII), Ivan?£oc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011), and Catan and Others (cited above) was wrong and at variance with public international law. - EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
17423/05 and 5 others, § 157, 28 February 2012; and Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, §§ 103 and 105-07). - EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 3648/04
CAVIT TINARLIOGLU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
In this context, the absence of any direct State responsibility for the death of an individual or for placing his life in danger does not exclude the applicability of Article 2 (see Cavit Tinarlioglu v. Turkey, no. 3648/04, § 61, 2 February 2016). - EGMR, 19.10.2012 - 43370/04
Transnistrien
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
The background to the case, including the Transdniestrian armed conflict of 1991-1992 and the subsequent events, is set out in Ila?Ÿcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, §§ 28-185, ECHR 2004-VII) and Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, §§ 8-42, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00
Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
It should, however, be capable of promptly establishing the facts, holding accountable those at fault and providing appropriate redress to the victim (compare Calvelli and Ciglio, cited above, § 49; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 89, ECHR 2004-VIII; ? ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 155 and 192, 9 April 2009; and Lopes de Sousa Fernandes, cited above, § 214). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
It applies in the context of any activity, whether public or not, in which the right to life may be at stake (Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 130, ECHR 2014, and Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, § 165, 19 December 2017). - EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
It also requires the State to make regulations compelling institutions, whether private or public, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of people's lives (see, in the context of the use of force by State agents, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 151, Series A no. 324; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 58, 59 and 62, ECHR 2004-XI; Peri?Ÿan and Others v. Turkey, no. 12336/03, § 85, 20 May 2010; in the context of health care, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 130; Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, § 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Lopes de Sousa Fernandez, cited above, § 166; and Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, § 105; in the context of industrial activities, Öneryildiz, cited above, §§ 71 and 90; and Kolyadenko and Others, § 158). - EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96
CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE