Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2021,16666
EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10 (https://dejure.org/2021,16666)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.06.2021 - 8833/10 (https://dejure.org/2021,16666)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Juni 2021 - 8833/10 (https://dejure.org/2021,16666)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,16666) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    TOTCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE

    No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 2 - ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

  • EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10

    Transnistrien

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    Reports by inter-governmental and non-governmental organisations, the relevant domestic law and practice of the Republic of Moldova, and other pertinent documents were summarised in Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 61-77, 23 February 2016).

    As they did in Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 92-94, 23 February 2016), the Russian Government expressed the view that the approach to the issue of jurisdiction taken by the Court in the cases of Ila?Ÿcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII), Ivan?£oc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011), and Catan and Others (cited above) was wrong and at variance with public international law.

  • EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 12336/03

    PERISAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    It also requires the State to make regulations compelling institutions, whether private or public, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of people's lives (see, in the context of the use of force by State agents, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 151, Series A no. 324; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 58, 59 and 62, ECHR 2004-XI; Peri?Ÿan and Others v. Turkey, no. 12336/03, § 85, 20 May 2010; in the context of health care, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 130; Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, § 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Lopes de Sousa Fernandez, cited above, § 166; and Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, § 105; in the context of industrial activities, Öneryildiz, cited above, §§ 71 and 90; and Kolyadenko and Others, § 158).
  • EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02

    BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    15339/02 and 4 others, § 129, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23687/05

    IVANTOC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    As they did in Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 92-94, 23 February 2016), the Russian Government expressed the view that the approach to the issue of jurisdiction taken by the Court in the cases of Ila?Ÿcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII), Ivan?£oc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011), and Catan and Others (cited above) was wrong and at variance with public international law.
  • EGMR, 28.02.2012 - 17423/05

    KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    17423/05 and 5 others, § 157, 28 February 2012; and Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, §§ 103 and 105-07).
  • EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 3648/04

    CAVIT TINARLIOGLU c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    In this context, the absence of any direct State responsibility for the death of an individual or for placing his life in danger does not exclude the applicability of Article 2 (see Cavit Tinarlioglu v. Turkey, no. 3648/04, § 61, 2 February 2016).
  • EGMR, 19.10.2012 - 43370/04

    Transnistrien

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    The background to the case, including the Transdniestrian armed conflict of 1991-1992 and the subsequent events, is set out in Ila?Ÿcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, §§ 28-185, ECHR 2004-VII) and Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia ([GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, §§ 8-42, ECHR 2012).
  • EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

    Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    It should, however, be capable of promptly establishing the facts, holding accountable those at fault and providing appropriate redress to the victim (compare Calvelli and Ciglio, cited above, § 49; Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 89, ECHR 2004-VIII; ? ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 155 and 192, 9 April 2009; and Lopes de Sousa Fernandes, cited above, § 214).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    It applies in the context of any activity, whether public or not, in which the right to life may be at stake (Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 130, ECHR 2014, and Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, § 165, 19 December 2017).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 8833/10
    It also requires the State to make regulations compelling institutions, whether private or public, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of people's lives (see, in the context of the use of force by State agents, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 151, Series A no. 324; Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 58, 59 and 62, ECHR 2004-XI; Peri?Ÿan and Others v. Turkey, no. 12336/03, § 85, 20 May 2010; in the context of health care, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 130; Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, § 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Lopes de Sousa Fernandez, cited above, § 166; and Fernandes de Oliveira, cited above, § 105; in the context of industrial activities, Öneryildiz, cited above, §§ 71 and 90; and Kolyadenko and Others, § 158).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

    CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

    MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht